Re: [QE-users] Error in piezoelectric coefficients calculation (Berry phase)

2023-08-04 Thread ANAND JHA
Thats because nbnd is only used for calculation type BANDS On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 19:43, Zimmi Singh wrote:Dear Users,I am attempting to calculate the piezoelectric coefficients of 2D MoS2 using the Berry Phase method on a strained structure (0.5% in the armchair direction). I faced two issues du

Re: [QE-users] Negative frequencies for phonon dispersion in Bilayer MoS2

2023-08-04 Thread ANAND JHA
Try CRYSTAL 23 or vesta On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 16:23, Giuseppe Scala wrote:I used a YouTube tutorial with BURAI for creating this input file, sigh. What should I do to create a right Bilayer using Burai or another software? Il ven 4 ago 2023, 12:14 ANAND JHA ha scritto:Its wr

[QE-users] Error in piezoelectric coefficients calculation (Berry phase)

2023-08-04 Thread Zimmi Singh
Dear Users, I am attempting to calculate the piezoelectric coefficients of 2D MoS2 using the Berry Phase method on a strained structure (0.5% in the armchair direction). I faced two issues during the process. 1) In the nscf calculations, I added the 'nbnd' tag in the input file ( nscf1.in). Howev

Re: [QE-users] Negative frequencies for phonon dispersion in Bilayer MoS2

2023-08-04 Thread Giuseppe Scala
I"m really grateful for the time you're dedicating to me. I tried tonight with lower tr2_ph and using a 4 4 1 k-point grid and the negative frequencies disappeared. Now I'm trying again with nq1=nq2=3 in order to improve the dispersion relation. In regards to occupation = 'smearing', I'm using It b

Re: [QE-users] Negative frequencies for phonon dispersion in Bilayer MoS2

2023-08-04 Thread Vahid Askarpour
A few points about your inputs: 1. You may want to lower both force and energy convergence thresholds by a factor of 10 2. You are using smearing. Is this a metal? If not, try a fixed occupation 3. For a bilayer, the KPOINTS should be like 4 4 1 or 6 6 1. From experience, since your a=3 angstr

Re: [QE-users] Negative frequencies for phonon dispersion in Bilayer MoS2

2023-08-04 Thread Vahid Askarpour
If the coordinates of the atoms are correct for the bilayer, you just need to add vacuum by adding 15 to 20 Ang to the c value. Cheers, Vahid Vahid Askarpour Department of Physics Dalhousie University Halifax, NS CANADA On Aug 4, 2023, at 7:08 AM, Giuseppe Scala wrote: CAUTION: The Sender of

Re: [QE-users] Negative frequencies for phonon dispersion in Bilayer MoS2

2023-08-04 Thread Giuseppe Scala
I used a YouTube tutorial with BURAI for creating this input file, sigh. What should I do to create a right Bilayer using Burai or another software? Il ven 4 ago 2023, 12:14 ANAND JHA ha scritto: > Its wrong > Becauese vaccume will be after the top surface of bilayer so u need to add > vaccume o

Re: [QE-users] Negative frequencies for phonon dispersion in Bilayer MoS2

2023-08-04 Thread ANAND JHA
Its wrong Becauese vaccume will be after the top surface of bilayer so u need to add vaccume on your top bilayer On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 15:38, Giuseppe Scala wrote:The c parameter is set in that way in order to have 10 angstrom vacuum between two sets of Bilayer in my structure. If I reduce the c p

Re: [QE-users] Negative frequencies for phonon dispersion in Bilayer MoS2

2023-08-04 Thread Giuseppe Scala
The c parameter is set in that way in order to have 10 angstrom vacuum between two sets of Bilayer in my structure. If I reduce the c parameter i think that my system won't be a Bilayer anymore. Is that line of reasoning wrong? Il ven 4 ago 2023, 05:15 ANAND JHA ha scritto: > C parameter and a p