Thats because nbnd is only used for calculation type BANDS On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 19:43, Zimmi Singh wrote:Dear Users,I am attempting
to calculate the piezoelectric coefficients of 2D MoS2 using the Berry
Phase method on a strained structure (0.5% in the armchair direction). I faced two issues du
Try CRYSTAL 23 or vesta On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 16:23, Giuseppe Scala wrote:I used a YouTube tutorial with BURAI for creating this input file, sigh. What should I do to create a right Bilayer using Burai or another software? Il ven 4 ago 2023, 12:14 ANAND JHA ha scritto:Its wr
Dear Users,
I am attempting to calculate the piezoelectric coefficients of 2D MoS2
using the Berry Phase method on a strained structure (0.5% in the armchair
direction).
I faced two issues during the process.
1) In the nscf calculations, I added the 'nbnd' tag in the input file (
nscf1.in). Howev
I"m really grateful for the time you're dedicating to me. I tried tonight
with lower tr2_ph and using a 4 4 1 k-point grid and the negative
frequencies disappeared. Now I'm trying again with nq1=nq2=3 in order to
improve the dispersion relation. In regards to occupation = 'smearing',
I'm using It b
A few points about your inputs:
1. You may want to lower both force and energy convergence thresholds by a
factor of 10
2. You are using smearing. Is this a metal? If not, try a fixed occupation
3. For a bilayer, the KPOINTS should be like 4 4 1 or 6 6 1. From experience,
since your a=3 angstr
If the coordinates of the atoms are correct for the bilayer, you just need to
add vacuum by adding 15 to 20 Ang to the c value.
Cheers,
Vahid
Vahid Askarpour
Department of Physics
Dalhousie University
Halifax, NS
CANADA
On Aug 4, 2023, at 7:08 AM, Giuseppe Scala wrote:
CAUTION: The Sender of
I used a YouTube tutorial with BURAI for creating this input file, sigh.
What should I do to create a right Bilayer using Burai or another software?
Il ven 4 ago 2023, 12:14 ANAND JHA ha scritto:
> Its wrong
> Becauese vaccume will be after the top surface of bilayer so u need to add
> vaccume o
Its wrong Becauese vaccume will be after the top surface of bilayer so u need to add vaccume on your top bilayer On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 15:38, Giuseppe Scala wrote:The c parameter is set in that way in order to have 10 angstrom vacuum between two sets of Bilayer in my structure. If I reduce the c p
The c parameter is set in that way in order to have 10 angstrom vacuum
between two sets of Bilayer in my structure. If I reduce the c parameter i
think that my system won't be a Bilayer anymore. Is that line of reasoning
wrong?
Il ven 4 ago 2023, 05:15 ANAND JHA ha scritto:
> C parameter and a p