Dear Felix
If I am correct, PBE contains self-interaction error, that means it may give a
wrong number when you use it to calculate a single electron system such as
hydrogen. Mayben you could try B3LYP or HSE.
Best wishes
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science
0
K_POINTS automatic
4 4 1 0 0 0
CELL_PARAMETERS angstrom
10.080.0.
0.0 10.00.
0.0. 10.
outdir='./'
degauss=0.01
DeltaE=0.001
lsym=.false.
/
-
not understand the reason but I seldom
get convergence when using semi-core PPs in periodical cases with PWSCF.
Good luck
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong
Dear Aditya
Just run projwfc.x on your wavefunction file of band structure, you can get the
AO components of every kpoints. See PP/example05.
Good luck
Pang Rui
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088
Dear Zhang
Maybe there is nothing wrong, you chose a MPI version, but your aministrator
may not allow you to directly run it in the front-end. Just try to submit a
parallel job and see if it end normally.
Sincerely
PangRui
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University
interfaced with pw.x can do
this job such as CALYPSO. If the structure is not the major property you
concern, you can use a MD process and reduce the temperature step by step.
Good luck
PangRui
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department
Dear Nicola
Thanks very much for your valuable comment.
Sincerely
PangRui
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong
-- Original
orbitals so that everyone use
wannier function? Or is there any misundertanding of me in using these
conception?
Welcome for any suggestion.
Sincerely
PangRui
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088
that everyone use wannier function? Or is there any
misundertanding of me in using these conception?
Welcome for any suggestion.
Sincerely
PangRui
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen
can see 16 kpoints with the
same weights, that means no symmetry is used. You may try it yourself to
confirm how to use nosym.
Sincerely
Pang Rui
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenz
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong
-- Original --
From: "Lingling Tao"<linglingtao2...@gmail.com>;
Date: Wed, Aug 26, 2015 03:00 P
it.
Sincerely
Pang Rui
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong
-- Original --
From: "Paolo Giannozzi"<p.gianno...@gmail.com
Dear Mohsen
You can find it on
http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Pseudopotentials
Sincerely
PangRui
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong
-- Original
Ah, it is intersting. I also got a similar problem but with PWCOND. And I found
the code stoped at a line of sum, quite unblievable. But my PW.X works well. I
think it is not a memory problem.
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China
ny help.
Sincerely.
Pang Rui
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
more core electrons as
valence electrons, it may be important for heavier elements. More detail can be
found in the pseudopotential generating note released with QE.
Sincerely
Pang Rui
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department
Dear David
You set "starting_magnetization(3)=0.5", but you only have two elements.
Therefore , the starting_magnetization of Fe is actually zero.
Best wishes.
Pang Rui
------
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physic
Dear Elham
I think usually, for gaussian smearing, 0.2eV is enough for relaxation and
0.05-0.01 eV is good for DOS and magnetic properties. You can always get a good
results by setting enough narrow gaussian smearing.
Sincerely
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University
Dear Yang
They can be found in
http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Pseudopotentials
Sincerely
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong
-- Original
7.667936645865039 0.000 0.000
0.000 7.667936645865040 0.00000000000
0.000 0.000 25.0
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
Dear siham
I think you can download from
http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Pseudopotentials
Best wishes
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong
I just test, what one need is just adding an 's' after http,
https://www.mail-archive.com/pw_forum@pwscf.org/
is accessable at least for me
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong
.
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong
-- Original --
From: "Andrea Floris"<an.flo...@gmail.com>;
Date: Tue, Jun
0.0069444
k( 172) = ( -0.833 0.833 0.000), wk = 0.0138889
Thanks for your help.
Best wishes.
----------
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xu
.
Best wishes!
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
to be used?
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics
No.1088,Xueyuan Road, Shenzhen,Guangdong___
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
the atomic orbits which are
already eignvalues of angular operator? It seems impossible if they are defined
as (3.200) in the book of "Modern quantum chemistry".Is there any
misunderstanding of me?
------
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
South University of Science and Technolog
luck.
--
庞瑞(PANG Rui)
南方科技大学/物理系
深圳市南山区西丽学苑大道1088号
-- Original --
From: "Jun Yin"<jun.yin...@gmail.com>;
Date: Thu, Jan 15, 2015 08:27 PM
To: "pw_forum"<pw_forum@pwscf.org>;
Subject: [Pw_f
28 matches
Mail list logo