.
Is there a way around for the projwfc.x to use less memory by playing with
parallelization options?
I have used for SCF: -npool 18 -ntg 4 -ndiag 32, and wf_collect = .true.
Is there a way to get estimation of used RAM?
Thanks in advance,
Martin Gmitra
Uni Regensburg, Germany
: -npool 3
-ndiag 32
Few more details below. Many thanks in advance for any hint,
Martin Gmitra
Uni Regensburg, Germany
For the calculations I am using relativistic USPP with tefield and dipfield
=.true., input for projwfc.x:
prefix = 'ppr',
outdir = '/scratch/' ,
lsym = .FALSE
therefore to semi-empirical dispersion term (DFT-D)
implemented in QE. What is your opinion to spin-polarized calculation
using the DFT-D?
Best regards,
Martin Gmitra
Uni Regensburg
Germany
that USPP and NCPP could not be the reason for the discrepancy, or?
Could you comment please on the origin of the discrepancies between QE and
LAPW?
Best regards,
Martin Gmitra
Uni Regensburg, Germany
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://pwscf.org
s between QE and
LAPW?
Best regards,
Martin Gmitra
Uni Regensburg, Germany
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://pwscf.org/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20130509/dd83a913/attachment.html
? It seems
that Martins-Troullier method for PP
is more robust. Could anyone comment on it please?
Best regards,
Martin Gmitra
Universit?t Regensburg
Institut I - Theoretische Physik
Universit?tsstra?e 31
D-93040 Regensburg
Deutschland/Germany
-- next part --
A non-text
figure, does not make
the frequencies positive for selected negative frequency (ecutwfc=57,
ecutrho=340), see arrow at middle figure.
None of this variation brings me to success. Could you please comment
or give some advices?
Best regards,
Martin Gmitra
Universit?t Regensburg
Institut I - Theoretische
Hi!
Such "crowded" bands one sees also for film calculations. Comparing
to 2D codes (e.g. FLEUR) I have seen that increasing vacuum clears
the "crowded" high energy states.
Martin Gmitra
Spintronics group
Uni Regensburg, Germany
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Gio