Dear qe users and developpers,
i want do calculations with hybrid functionnal using qe 5.0.1 parallel version
after 23 iterations and plot k, the job suddenly stops without any error
the last line in the output file is :? " the Fermi energy is??? 12.1994 ev"
i can't say "out of memory" because
Dear qe users and developers,
i wonder if the Armiento and Mattsson 2005 (AM05) functionnal
implemented into quantum espresso (actually i use espresso5.0.1)
if yes can I use the
same input file like PBE0,? just I put input_dft='am05' in my input file??
cheers
Dear all,
i want to do k-resolveddos, in the exapmle08 (espresso-4.3.2) K-resolved PDOS
calculation along Delta and Sigma lines are computed before in the band
calculation.
i wonder if i can do scf and nscf calculation and then k-resolved DOS without
doing band calculation, if? yes how can i
Dear Fernando
***
??? prefix? = '...'
??? outdir? = '$TMP_DIR',
??? filplot = '...'
??? plot_num= 0? ---> charge
?/
? nfile=1
? filepp(1)='...'
? iflag=3? ---> 3D plot
? output_format=5? ---> format suitble for xcrysden
? e1(1)=1.0,
Dear all,
I do self consistent calculation for fr relaxed structur, after few minutes the
it stops without printing? any error message.
i do not understand what's happened
*.scf.out
===?
?? Program PWSCF v.5.0.1 starts on 26Jun2013 at 15:19:34
thank you very much
De?: Giuseppe Mattioli
??: PWSCF Forum
Envoy? le : Mercredi 5 juin 2013 16h42
Objet?: Re: [Pw_forum] Lowdin Charges
Dear Sakhrawi Taoufek
I'm not sure I have understood... Yes, Bader? (or "Natural") charges are (best)
ght) values. Nevertheless, you may trust in trends: you change?
something and see how the Lowdin partition reacts to such changes...
HTH
Giuseppe
Quoting Sakhrawi Taoufek :
> i am sorry, i mean the unit of total charge, i am traying to do?
> charge transfer with lowdin charge
Mattioli
??: PWSCF Forum
Envoy? le : Mardi 4 juin 2013 13h55
Objet?: Re: [Pw_forum] Lowdin Charges
Dear Sakhraoui Taoufik
And... what are you asking...? :-)
Giuseppe
Giuseppe mattioli
ISM-CNR
Italy
Quoting Sakhrawi Taoufek :
> Dear all,
>
> it seems naaive but i am really ask
Dear all,
it seems naaive but i am really asking about Lowdin charge calculated with pdos.
===
Lowdin Charges:
Atom #?? 1: total charge =?? 7.2206, s =? 0.4905, p =? 0., d =? 6.7302,
spin up? =?? 5.1646, s =?
ion
with Ultrasoft pps should i repeat all calculations with PAW PP's.
De?: Giuseppe Mattioli
??: PWSCF Forum
Envoy? le : Vendredi 31 mai 2013 10h11
Objet?: Re: [Pw_forum] bader analysis
Dear Sakhrawi Taoufek (and Ari, Giovanni, Axel)
I've done some test
Dear all,
i want to study charge transfer in interface metal/oxide with bader analysis, i
looked in the archive of the forum,?found this link
http://theory.cm.utexas.edu/vtsttools/bader/
but corresponds to vasp code.
how can i proceed after generating a cube with pp.x??
thinks
why no suggestion!!
De?: Sakhrawi Taoufek
??: "Pw_forum at pwscf.org"
Envoy? le : Mercredi 29 mai 2013 13h12
Objet?: [Pw_forum] *.save non existent or non writable
Dear all,
i am doing scf calculations (parallel run) with qe 5.
Dear all,
i am doing scf calculations (parallel run) with qe 5.0.1.
after many iterations it crashes with error "*.save non existent or non
writable"
i virify with "ls -l? /*/*/*.save" the folder exists and writable and it
contains files : charge-density.dat, data-file.xml???
K1?
Dear all,
i am doing relax calculation, i want to restart calculation from the last
iteration and last geometry where job stops, so in the control section i
activate "restart_mode='restart'", but when rerun the job it starts from the
beginning!!!
note that in the scratch folder there is all
Dear,
I am doing MD calculation in QuantumEspresso-5.0.1, and have a question now...
ion_dynamics='verlet',
ion_temperature='rescale-v',
tempw= 300.D0, nraise=20,
dear,
doing born openheimer molecular dynamics, in the job i modify the temperature
but everytime i have the same output with
kinetic energy (Ekin) = 0. Ry
temperature?? =??? NaN K
Ekin + Etot (const)?? =? -517.89584213 Ry
Dear emine,
as yo see the energy is written as function as volume, Each structure has its
own volume.
So? >> the equation is written as function as volume >? the equation is
written as fucion as structurre.
De?: Kucukbenli Emine
??: PWSCF Forum
Envoy?
dear all,
when i want to fit with murnaghan eos with ev.x, i should choose the structure
(fcc, bcc, sc or hex)
>>> Enter type of bravais lattice (fcc, bcc, sc, hex)
in my case i work with bct (body centered tetragonal) stucture.
what type of structure should i use??
thanks in advance
Dear all,
i use the same for pdos calculation with projwfc.x, it works with
espresso-4.3.2 but not with espresso-5.0.1 with the error message :
Error in routine projwfc (1):? reading projwfc namelist
my input is :
?
??? prefix='fe',
??? outdir='$outdir',
??? degauss=0.01,
???
Dear all,
I actually did some calculations with my pc and i passed another group that
they are creating an account for me on a machine (Parallel calculation). I saw
an example of a script they use, rely on input (using the code VASP). My
question is how can i write a script that i can "call"
dear all,
i do surface calculation with pw.x, i want to estimate the C value in the
tetragonal structure,?
after scf calculation i find that many values of C have the same energy which
you can see it in the figure.
thanks
Sakhraoui Taoufik
LMCN
Faculty of science
Monastir,
dear all,
i do surface calculation with pw.x, i want to estimate the C value in the
tetragonal structure,?
after scf calculation i find that many values of C have the same energy which
you can see it in the figure.
thanks
SakhraouiTaoufik
LMCN
Faculty of science
Monastir,
dear all,
I go to use parallel executions, i can execute pw.x, dos.x, but not ev.x
!!!
there is any idea how to proceed??
thanks in advance
Sakhraoui Taoufik
LMCN
Faculty of science
Monastir, Tunisia
-- next part --
An HTML
Dear qe users,
i do post processing calculation for Fe with "projwfc.x", the output file look
like "fe.pdos_***", this is fe.pdos_atm#1(Fe)_wfc#2(d) file :
###
# E (eV)? ldosup(E)? ldosdw(E) pdosup(E)? pdosdw(E)?
dear qe users,
I found in many references the authors pointed out the eg and t2g band
in the DOS, and wrote in the text accordingly that it had eg
symmetry (or t2g symmetry). How do i conclude that just from one
Dos?
Best regards
==
Sakhraoui TAOUFIK
PhD student
LMCN,
Dear all,
I try to optimize the lattice parameter of different compounds, i fit with
ev.x, the problem is that only in the case of compound MgO, it gives me no
result???
[***@*** MgO_cc]$ ../../../bin/ev.x
Lattice parameter or Volume
Dear all,
i want to run plotrho.x for FeRh,
my input file
###
ferh_fm.charge001.dat
0. 0. 0.,
0. 0. 1.,
1. 1. 0.,
ferh_fm.charge001.ps
29 41 ,
n
0.001411 0.087060,
0 0.09 10,
###
the error message :
"At line 40 of file plotrho.f90 (unit = 1, file =
I read the file, but I have not figured out how to fix the volume myself then i
each time extract the total energy
De?: Paolo Giannozzi
??: Sakhrawi Taoufek ; PWSCF Forum
Envoy? le : Lundi 12 novembre 2012 9h22
Objet?: Re: [Pw_forum] fix volume
On Mon
Dear all,
i want to fix the volume and each time calculate the total energy to optimize
the lattice parameter, there is any idea how to proceed.
each suggestion will be appreciated.
Sakhraoui
Taoufik
Ph.D student
Faculty of Sciences of Monastir
Department of
Dear all
i am calculating the lattice parameter for antiferromagnetic FeRh, it dosen't
converge.
###
??? prefix='FeRh_afm',
??? pseudo_dir = '***/',
??? outdir='***/'
?/
?
??? ibrav= 0,??? celldm(1) =$alat,
??? nat=4,??? ntyp=3,
??? ecutwfc = 20,
???
Dear Lorenzo
I added the hooks and it works without any change in the code.
##
?[?
?? /]
?[
? /]
#
thank you
De?: Lorenzo Paulatto
??: PWSCF Forum
Envoy? le : Mardi 6 novembre 2012 11h08
Objet?: Re: [Pw_forum] Relaxtion
On 6
Dear all
i try do relax atomic positions with constant volume for FeRh non magnetic
compound,
my input file:
##
?
??? calculation = 'vc-relax',
??? restart_mode='from_scratch',
??? prefix='FeRh',
??? pseudo_dir = '../',
??? outdir='../'
???
Dear all
i try do relax atomic positions with constant volume for FeRh non magnetic
compound,
my input file:
##
?
??? calculation = 'vc-relax',
??? restart_mode='from_scratch',
??? prefix='FeRh',
??? pseudo_dir = '../',
??? outdir='../'
???
Dear all
I do a calculation of the density of states of non-magnetic FeRh, looking in
the file. ** scf.out I found:
##
the Fermi energy is??? 14.7785 ev
!??? total energy? = -99.87320782 Ry
Harris-Foulkes estimate??
i read that the value of starting magnetization is used to brake the up/dw
symmetry? in the charge density but when i fix all parameters and i change the
values of starting magnetization the value of total magnetization and
the magnetic moment of each atom changes. U can't understand the
Dear all,
I try to do a calculation of antiferromagnetic FeRh, by changing different
parameters (point_k, smearing, ECUT ...),? i can find the expected value of the
total magnetic momentwich is not the case forthe magnetic moment of each
atom.Is there a way to get the magnetic moment of each
parameter, nearest-neighbour
distances, xc-functional, k-point sampling, smearing,? ...
stefano
On 10/06/2012 11:01 AM, Sakhrawi Taoufek wrote:
Dear all
I try to do dos calculation for FeRh ferromagnetic. Itried with different
values ??starting_magnetization to reach the expected value
Dear all
how to know the high symmetry points of any structure (in my case the structure
is cubic)??
thinks?
---
Sakhraoui Taoufik
Phd student
Department of Physics
Faculty of
Dear all,
i want to calculate the ferromagnetique structure for Fe compound, in the
litterature i find that the magnetic moment is 2.84.
in the pwscf_input : -1< starting_magnetization<1
i can't understand the relation between starting_magnetization and the magnetic
moment
there is any
i'am trying to estimate celldm(1) for the compound FeRh, the problem is thatI
always find a value that doubles the expected value
# self-consistent calculation
cat > ferh_fm.scf.in << EOF
?
??? prefix='FeRh_fm',
???
Dear pwsf users,
I made ??a pw.xcalculation for the compound FeRh to estimate the value of
celldm(1), the problem is thatI always find a value that doubles the expected
value
Do you have any idea what to do
thank you
My input :
i'am trying to estimate celldm(1) for the compound FeRh, the problem is thatI
always find a value that doubles the expected value
# self-consistent calculation
cat > ferh_fm.scf.in << EOF
?
??? prefix='FeRh_fm',
???
in this cite you choose your element and you see all pseudopotentials
http://www.quantum-espresso.org/?page_id=190
Sakhraoui Taoufik
d?partement de physique, facult? des sciences de monastir
Monastir, Tunisia
De?: Ary Junior
??: PWSCF Forum
Envoy? le :
I made ??a pw.xcalculation for the compound FeRh to estimate the value of a,
the problem is thatI always find a value that doubles the expected value
Do you have any idea what to do
thank you
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
Dr. Gianozzi
i am new in pwscf calculations:
wen calculating lattice the code stops!
Program PWSCF v.4.2??? starts on 10Sep2012 at 14:52:45
This program is part of the open-source Quantum ESPRESSO suite
for quantum simulation of materials; please acknowledge
"P.
45 matches
Mail list logo