Re: [Pw_forum] Magnetization on the Fe atom doped on the graphene

2015-07-18 Thread David Foster
Dear Pang, Thank you for your kindness. I will correct the input and report the corrected total_magnetization, as soon as possible. However, I think total_magnetization should not be changed, due to the approach I took in my previous calculation (I have not fixed it, and the correct value

Re: [Pw_forum] Magnetization on the Fe atom doped on the graphene

2015-07-18 Thread 庞瑞(PANG Rui)
Dear David You set "starting_magnetization(3)=0.5", but you only have two elements. Therefore , the starting_magnetization of Fe is actually zero. Best wishes. Pang Rui -- 庞瑞(PANG Rui) South University of Science and Technology of China/Department of Physics

[Pw_forum] Magnetization on the Fe atom doped on the graphene

2015-07-17 Thread David Foster
Dear Users I have doped one Fe atom in the supercell of graphene, and used "starting_magnetization" keyword (due to the electronic configuration of Fe which is 4s2 3d6). Here it is my input: = title = 'graph44' calculation = 'vc-relax'