Re: [QE-users] Different results for charged cluster in PHonon 5.1 and 7.2

2024-02-18 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On 15/02/2024 09:56, RABONE Jeremy wrote: It is no great problem since these calculations are fine using finite differences, but I was just curious as to what has happened and whether it was intentional (i.e. should calculations that were done using the old version be considered more

Re: [QE-users] Different results for charged cluster in PHonon 5.1 and 7.2

2024-02-15 Thread RABONE Jeremy
Hello, That's the thing - the calculations run as they should, everything is apparently as it should be but the frequencies are shifted significantly. I have done a few other tests of other charged clusters and H2O vs H3O+ and comparison with finite differences calculations and it genuinely

Re: [QE-users] Different results for charged cluster in PHonon 5.1 and 7.2

2024-02-14 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
Hello, On top of what Paola says, I would recommend checking the output of pw.x first. If the total energy calculation is not identical, the phonons results will be widely different. And if there is a difference in the total energy calculation, it could be traced back more easily to a change

Re: [QE-users] Different results for charged cluster in PHonon 5.1 and 7.2

2024-02-14 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On 2/14/24 11:14, RABONE Jeremy wrote:   I have re-run a Phonon calculation for a charged cluster that was done using version 5.1 with version 7.2 and the results are completely different; there is a large positive shift in the frequencies. Can somebody tell me what was done differently in

[QE-users] Different results for charged cluster in PHonon 5.1 and 7.2

2024-02-14 Thread RABONE Jeremy
Hello, I have re-run a Phonon calculation for a charged cluster that was done using version 5.1 with version 7.2 and the results are completely different; there is a large positive shift in the frequencies. Can somebody tell me what was done differently in 5.1 for charged cells ? Kind