Re: [QE-users] HFX and USPP (QE6.3)

2019-02-14 Thread Michal Krompiec
Dear Paolo, Do you mean L-ACE https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.09263.pdf? Is L-ACE already available in the development branch? Best, Michal Krompiec Merck / U Southampton On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 15:21, Paolo Giannozzi wrote: > SCDM is coming (very) soon but not with USPP > > Paolo > > On Thu, Feb 14,

Re: [QE-users] HFX and USPP (QE6.3)

2019-02-14 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
SCDM is coming (very) soon but not with USPP Paolo On Thu, Feb 14, 2019 at 12:46 PM Tobias Kloeffel wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > since no one else noticed it, I guess there is not much interest in > implementing it? I saw USPP + SCDM on some > old slides from the development meeting back in

Re: [QE-users] HFX and USPP (QE6.3)

2019-02-14 Thread Tobias Kloeffel
Hi Lorenzo, since no one else noticed it, I guess there is not much interest in implementing it? I saw USPP + SCDM on some  old slides from the development meeting back in 2017. However, if forces are not available I guess SCDM is also not on the current todo list? On 2/13/19 12:34 PM,

Re: [QE-users] HFX and USPP (QE6.3)

2019-02-13 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
The energy minimum is at around 1.249A whereas the force minimum is at 1.253A, is there something missing in the force evaluation if PBE0 is used? It is quite likely, I did not implement it and I doubt anybody else did. I think it is more or less a matter of adding the HF contributions to the

[QE-users] HFX and USPP (QE6.3)

2019-02-13 Thread Tobias Kloeffel
Dear all, since I did not find anything in the release notes about the status of HFX in combination with USPP, I performed a small test with two C-atoms. The results, however, look odd: The energy minimum is at around 1.249A whereas the force minimum is at 1.253A, is there something missing