Re: [QE-users] Huge memory requirements for a scf calculation of a system consisting with 300+ atoms.

2020-05-27 Thread Nicola Marzari
Fully agree with this! If I can add, using the Baldereschi point (or, to make it simple, 1/4 1/4/ 1/4 in crystal coordinates), and nosym=.true. allows you to do a calculation with one k-point that is almost as accurate as using a 2x2x2 shifted monkhorst pack mesh (i.e. 2 2 2 1 1 1), at a

Re: [QE-users] Huge memory requirements for a scf calculation of a system consisting with 300+ atoms.

2020-05-27 Thread Giuseppe Mattioli
Dear all Just to add a bit of personal experience that might be useful to others. Let's admit that many k-points are necessary to provide a good description of the electronic properties of a given system, this is generally true in the case of metal systems. This fact might not extend to

Re: [QE-users] Huge memory requirements for a scf calculation of a system consisting with 300+ atoms.

2020-05-27 Thread Sebastian Hütter
Hi, This may be a stupid question, but... Estimated static dynamical RAM per process > 3.32 GB Estimated max dynamical RAM per process > 10.52 GB Estimated total dynamical RAM > 462.96 GB ... is this not expected behavior? I'm not super experienced, so I just

Re: [QE-users] Huge memory requirements for a scf calculation of a system consisting with 300+ atoms.

2020-05-26 Thread Hongyi Zhao
Paolo Giannozzi 于2020年5月27日周三 上午12:13写道: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:34 PM Hongyi Zhao wrote: > >> Do you mean this is achievable by applying the patch given below? > > > not sure, it depends upon your hardware and many other factors. I am just > suggesting a few things you may try (in

Re: [QE-users] Huge memory requirements for a scf calculation of a system consisting with 300+ atoms.

2020-05-26 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 2:34 PM Hongyi Zhao wrote: Do you mean this is achievable by applying the patch given below? > not sure, it depends upon your hardware and many other factors. I am just suggesting a few things you may try (in addition to the main one: reducing the cutoff and/or the

Re: [QE-users] Huge memory requirements for a scf calculation of a system consisting with 300+ atoms.

2020-05-26 Thread Hongyi Zhao
Paolo Giannozzi 于2020年5月26日周二 下午3:24写道: > > With 300+ atoms, relatively large cutoffs (60/480), several k-points, yes, > the amount of needed RAM memory is large. If you want to stick to your > parameters (cutoffs and k-points) you may reduce the amount of needed memory > by > - parallelizing

Re: [QE-users] Huge memory requirements for a scf calculation of a system consisting with 300+ atoms.

2020-05-26 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
With 300+ atoms, relatively large cutoffs (60/480), several k-points, yes, the amount of needed RAM memory is large. If you want to stick to your parameters (cutoffs and k-points) you may reduce the amount of needed memory by - parallelizing over as many pools as k-points (avoids "w. buffer"

[QE-users] Huge memory requirements for a scf calculation of a system consisting with 300+ atoms.

2020-05-25 Thread Hongyi Zhao
Hi, I try to run a scf calculation of my system consisting with 300+ atoms, but the pw.x gives the following estimated resource requirements: Dynamical RAM for wfc: 204.96 MB Dynamical RAM for wfc (w. buffer):1844.62 MB Dynamical RAM for