Re: [QE-users] Memory issues using pw.x

2023-01-20 Thread Giuseppe Mattioli
ed just let me know. Thank you, Joe From: users on behalf of Giuseppe Mattioli Date: Friday, 20 January 2023 at 11:23 To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum Subject: Re: [QE-users] Memory issues using pw.x ** THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATED OUTSIDE LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY ** ** Be wary of links or atta

Re: [QE-users] Memory issues using pw.x

2023-01-20 Thread Joe Page
nuary 2023 at 11:23 To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum Subject: Re: [QE-users] Memory issues using pw.x ** THIS MESSAGE ORIGINATED OUTSIDE LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY ** ** Be wary of links or attachments, especially if the email is unsolicited or you don't recognise the sender's email address. ** Dear Josep

Re: [QE-users] Memory issues using pw.x

2023-01-20 Thread Giuseppe Mattioli
Dear Joseph Impossible to say more without seeing your input and knowing your available resources. Is the estimate printed close to the beginning of the pw.x output, like this Estimated max dynamical RAM per process > 1.51 GB Estimated total dynamical RAM > 48.27 GB

[QE-users] Memory issues using pw.x

2023-01-19 Thread Joe Page
Hi, I am sending this message as I am running into some issues when trying to perform a pw.x calculation. I am using a hybrid approach, with the flag input_dft = b3lpyv1r. The first SCF calculation can be performed, however when it comes to introducing the hybrid correction the program stops