Re: [QE-users] Wrong electron number in superposition of atomic charge densities

2020-08-28 Thread Colonna Nicola (PSI)
: [QE-users] Wrong electron number in superposition of atomic charge densities Ciao Nicola Quick and I don't know how dirty: generate a pseudo with 12 electrons copy the rhoatom section from there and copy it in place of the 11 electrons rhoat in the pseudo you've been using. greetings

Re: [QE-users] Wrong electron number in superposition of atomic charge densities

2020-08-28 Thread Pietro Davide Delugas
Ciao Nicola Quick and I don't know how dirty: generate a pseudo with 12 electrons   copy  the rhoatom section from there  and copy it in  place of the 11 electrons rhoat in the pseudo you've been using.  greetings - Pietro On 8/27/20 5:28 PM, Colonna Nicola (PSI) wrote: Dear QE experts,

Re: [QE-users] Wrong electron number in superposition of atomic charge densities

2020-08-27 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
(Not-so-)Quick and dirty fix: run the atomic code for the Ti pseudopotential on the ground-state electronic configuration; replace the (pseudo-)atomic charge in the file with the one you get for the ground state. Only the starting charge will be affected. Paolo On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 5:28 PM

[QE-users] Wrong electron number in superposition of atomic charge densities

2020-08-27 Thread Colonna Nicola (PSI)
Dear QE experts, I recently perfomed a scf PBEsol calculation for Tb2Ti2O7 (attached the input file). I would like to plot the difference between the scf charge density and the superposition of atomic charge. For this purpose I used the PostProcessing tool (plut_num = 9). I expected