Re: [QE-users] unable to produce spin resolved DOS and bands using ISPIN=2

2022-10-05 Thread Marcelo Falcão de Oliveira via users
Dear Eesha, I think you should try starting_magnetization = 1 for breaking the symmetry. See the pw.x manual, it states that "Note that if you start from zero initial magnetization, you will invariably end up in a nonmagnetic (zero magnetization) state." Em qua., 5 de out. de 2022 às 11:34,

Re: [QE-users] unable to produce spin resolved DOS and bands using ISPIN=2

2022-10-05 Thread Eesha Sanjay Andharia
: Wednesday, October 5, 2022 12:48 PM To: Quantum ESPRESSO users Forum Subject: Re: [QE-users] unable to produce spin resolved DOS and bands using ISPIN=2 Dear Eesha > Do I need to provide starting magnetization for both the atoms? Yes, you do if you want to converge to an antiferromagnetic gro

Re: [QE-users] unable to produce spin resolved DOS and bands using ISPIN=2

2022-10-05 Thread Giuseppe Mattioli
Dear Eesha Do I need to provide starting magnetization for both the atoms? Yes, you do if you want to converge to an antiferromagnetic ground state. You should provide two different starting magnetizations using fake atomic labels, e.g, Cr1 and Cr2, in a range between 0 (no

[QE-users] unable to produce spin resolved DOS and bands using ISPIN=2

2022-10-05 Thread Eesha Sanjay Andharia
Hi, I am trying to learn spin-resolved DOS and Bands calculation using 2D CrI3 as an example. It is doing the calculations without any error. However, the spin up and spin down channel are exactly the same qualitatively and quantitatively. Here is my scf input file: calculation = 'scf'