For gamma point calculation you can directly use dynmat.x for imposition of
asr.
Prasenjit
On 8 August 2015 at 00:30, David Foster wrote:
> Dear users,
> I calculated phonons at gamma point of a 2*2 supercell of graphene after
> vc-relax>scf.
> all frequencies are
please provide your input file
Regards
David Foster
Ph.D. Student of Chemistry
On Fri, 8/7/15, Mojtaba Mirseraji wrote:
Subject: [Pw_forum] Wrong k-string? in nscf+lelfield
To: Pw_forum@pwscf.org
Date: Friday, August 7,
Dear users,
I calculated phonons at gamma point of a 2*2 supercell of graphene after
vc-relax>scf.
all frequencies are positive.
Now, I need to use q2r.x code to impose ASR on them.
The ph.x generated one matdyn file which I named it as "graph22G.dyn",
but q2r.x code searches for graph22G.dyn0.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:08 AM, Mahya Zare wrote:
please stop flooding this mailing list with repeated requests of the
same kind and particularly stop the extremely rude practice of
hijacking threads on completely different topics.
> Dear Users
> Kindly help me how to
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Ludwig, Stephan
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using Quantum-Espresso on a cluster. With normconserving
> pseudopotentials. I don't have any problems.
>
> With ultrasoft pseudos I also receive a result for ecutwfc=60 ecutrho=240
Dear Users
I perform lelfield=.true. option in PWSCF (only in nscf) for berry
calculations of polarization but unfortunately
" Wrong k-string? "
error is showed.
I do not know how to solve it
Regards
Mojtaba Mirseraji
Ph.D. Candidate
Theoretical Condensed Matter Physics
Arak Univ.
IRAN
Whoever you are,
you have a problem quite different from mine. Maybe you can open your own
discussion with a more suitable name for your subject.
When you answer with your question on my question it might happen that no one
will care about my question because they might think that it is
Dear Users
Kindly help me how to make Ceo2 nano sheet. I used the lattice
parameters a=5.411A, C=15.0A, space group fm3m (225)
and atomic positions Ce 0 0 0, and O 1/4 1/4 1/4,O 3/4 3/4 3/4 which
are not looks ok. Please help me for makes pwscf
Whether the position of atoms in the bulk of
Hello,
I'm using Quantum-Espresso on a cluster. With normconserving pseudopotentials.
I don't have any problems.
With ultrasoft pseudos I also receive a result for ecutwfc=60 ecutrho=240 (I
did it just for test purpuses).
When I enlarge these parameters to more sensible values (ecutwfc=80,