I think the code can use both at the same time, but it doesn't seem to me a
good idea to add VdW interactions twice: once with non-local functionals,
once with semi-empiric corrections
Paolo
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Saif Ullah wrote:
> As per my limited
As per my limited knowledge, only one option can be used. vdW-df is
non-local, so it does not need C6 etc.
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Eleftheria Gkogkosi
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it acceptable to set input_dft='vdw-DF' and then also use
> vdw_corr='DFT-D' in order to
Hello,
Is it acceptable to set input_dft='vdw-DF' and then also use
vdw_corr='DFT-D' in order to adjust london_c6(1) parameters?
Or does one have to choose between a) non local functions (e.g. vdw-DF)
and b) london correction to the, say, PBE functionals?
--
Eleftheria Gkogkosi
Applied
Dear Quantum Espresso experts,
I would like to simulate a hetero-structure of a metallic and an insulating
material,to obtain the band structure using QE,what should be the value of
occupations? Will it be fixed or smearing.Remember the structure is a metal
semiconductor interface.
Thanks and
Thank you! I did a make clean before I received this, and remade, and now it is
working.
Ron
---
Ronald Cohen
Extreme Materials Initiative
Geophysical Laboratory
Carnegie Institution
5251 Broad Branch Rd., N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20015
rco...@carnegiescience.edu
Please delete Modules/xc_vdW_DF.o and PW/src/stres_nonloc_dft.o, recompile
with -D__SPIN_BALANCED
Paolo
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Ronald Cohen
wrote:
> I still get:
> %%%
> %%%
>
I still get:
%%
Error in routine stres_vdW_DF (1):
vdW stress not implemented for nspin > 1
%%
stopping ...
Performing
Hi Friends,I am trying to optimize a supercell using vc-relax. In a first
step, I used the space group to optimize one unit cell which gives a reasonable
cell volume. Later, when I tried using same unit cell to optimize a supercell
using ibrav = 14, unit cell volume keeps on shrinking and
The error you have might be due to insufficient memory, but projwfc.x does
not (or should not) require more memory than the corresponding scf
calculation. Please provide your scf input (if it doesn't take a week to
run)
Paolo
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Martin Gmitra
Respected Sir/ Madam,
I have made scf files and other input files of GaAs of Wurtzite Structure
which are attached here.
Kindly check these files because pw.x commands run smoothly but when I run
ph.x command it does not executes...it shows runtime errors. I also want to
ask that whether is it
can you send your input file
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Krishnendu Mukherjee <
krishnendu.mukherjee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Respected members,
>
> My first QE simulation failed with the following output file (please see
> attached).
>
> Please guide me ,
>
> Thanking you,
> Sincerely,
>
Respected members,
My first QE simulation failed with the following output file (please see
attached).
Please guide me ,
Thanking you,
Sincerely,
Krishnendu
--
Dr. Krishnendu Mukherjee,
Principal Scientist,
CSIR-NML,
Jamshedpur.
test.out
Description: Binary data
Dear all,
please modify the file install/plugins_list as follows:
GIPAW=qe-gipaw-6.2
GIPAW_URL=http://qe-forge.org/gf/download/frsrelease/245/1119/qe-gipaw-6.2.tar.gz
Best,
Davide
On 10/25/2017 09:56 AM, José Carlos Conesa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I installed this recent version of QE
Dear Lorenzo,
What about noncollinear magnetization?
What do 'r, theta, phi [deg]' mean?
Where in the literature can I read about these parameters?
26.10.2017, 18:24, "Lorenzo Paulatto" :
> With pp.x you can plot charge density of spin up and spin down
> separately, you can
Respected Sir/ Madam,
I have made scf files and other input files of GaAs of Wurtzite Structure
which are attached here.
Kindly check these files because pw.x commands run smoothly but when I run
ph.x command it does not executes...it shows runtime errors. I also want to
ask that whether is it
15 matches
Mail list logo