Re: [QE-users] pw.x Segmentation failed with libxc

2018-12-19 Thread 魏亚东
It compiles and works normally, thanks again. -原始邮件- 发件人:"Paolo Giannozzi" 发送时间:2018-12-19 21:15:37 (星期三) 收件人: "Quantum Espresso users Forum" 抄送: 主题: Re: [QE-users] pw.x Segmentation failed with libxc That is? it "compiles and works" and "compiles but still does not work"? On Wed,

Re: [QE-users] SCF energy tolerance of GGA+U for Er2O3

2018-12-19 Thread David Foster
Dear Lorenzo,My system is an output of optimized experimental primitive structure of Er2O3. Since I know it has a gap, I used a small smearing instead of occupation=fixed for better convergence of SCF. However, you know that using large smearing produces wrong results. I use your comment to

Re: [QE-users] pw.x Segmentation failed with libxc

2018-12-19 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
That is? it "compiles and works" and "compiles but still does not work"? On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 2:14 PM 魏亚东 wrote: > Thanks a lot, with reinstalling libxc-4.2.3, pw.x has been compiled > normally. > > > -Original Messages- > *From:*"Paolo Giannozzi" > *Sent Time:*2018-12-19 00:00:44

[QE-users] 答复: 答复: DFT+U can not converge

2018-12-19 Thread LEUNG Clarence
Thanks very much. Both cases I will try with and without saturation. 发件人: users 代表 Giuseppe Mattioli 发送时间: 2018年12月19日 21:11 收件人: users@lists.quantum-espresso.org 主题: Re: [QE-users] 答复: DFT+U can not converge Yes, I suppose so, but it is not easy to say

Re: [QE-users] pw.x Segmentation failed with libxc

2018-12-19 Thread 魏亚东
Thanks a lot, with reinstalling libxc-4.2.3, pw.x has been compiled normally. -Original Messages- From:"Paolo Giannozzi" Sent Time:2018-12-19 00:00:44 (Wednesday) To: "Quantum Espresso users Forum" Cc: Subject: Re: [QE-users] pw.x Segmentation failed with libxc On Tue, Dec 18, 2018

Re: [QE-users] 答复: DFT+U can not converge

2018-12-19 Thread Giuseppe Mattioli
Yes, I suppose so, but it is not easy to say exactly how it has to be done in this case (H or OH saturation? surface reconstruction?). If you are lucky, you may find something in literature... Best Giuseppe LEUNG Clarence ha scritto: Dear Giuseppe, Thanks for your suggest. My

[QE-users] 答复: DFT+U can not converge

2018-12-19 Thread LEUNG Clarence
Dear Giuseppe, Thanks for your suggest. My structure is (3 1 0) surface of Co3(PO4)2 with 15 angstrom vacuum. You mean that the unsaturated bond should be passivated by H or something? LIANG Xiongyi 发件人: users 代表 Giuseppe Mattioli 发送时间: 2018年12月19日 19:30

Re: [QE-users] DFT+U can not converge

2018-12-19 Thread Giuseppe Mattioli
Dear Liang Xiongyi In my opinion, your initial structure is possibly wrong or missing necessary saturation (i.e. twofold-coordinated P atoms on the surface and P=O free terminations, which are likely unstable in gas phase). However, and generally speaking, if your calculation is going

Re: [QE-users] Unexpected adsorption energy

2018-12-19 Thread Giuseppe Mattioli
Dear Mohamed I'm afraid that I cannot help you more than this without seeing your input files. If you want, you can send them in private. HTH Giuseppe Mohamed Safy ha scritto: Dear Giuseppe I took your advice but the E[cation+anion] system was very difficult to be converged. I tried to

[QE-users] DFT+U can not converge

2018-12-19 Thread LEUNG Clarence
Dear QEusers, When I use QE6.3 to perform DFT+U to relax a slab, it is very difficult to converge and even can not converge (more than 300 scf steps). Thanks for your suggestion in advances. The input file is: calculation='relax', nstep = 200 , wf_collect = .true. , etot_conv_thr =