Re: [QE-users] Error in using tmax variable in thermo_pw

2020-08-20 Thread Pooja Vyas
The above described error is faced as soon as I choose tmax>800 K. On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:41 PM Pooja Vyas wrote: > Dear users, > I'm computing example22 of thermo_pw. The default values of tmin and tmax > are 1 and 800 K respectively. But, if I try computing the same example with > T=3000

[QE-users] big system run ...

2020-08-20 Thread Ilias Miroslav, doc. RNDr., PhD.
Hello, I am trying to run big system (more than 300 atoms) with gpu-QE, see https://gitlab.com/QEF/q-e-gpu/-/issues/53#note_398955938 but in the output there is no message on what can be missing (my poor guess it is memory). Is there a way to make such system running with QE ? If yes, how ?

[QE-users] Error in using tmax variable in thermo_pw

2020-08-20 Thread Pooja Vyas
Dear users, I'm computing example22 of thermo_pw. The default values of tmin and tmax are 1 and 800 K respectively. But, if I try computing the same example with T=3000 K, it shows me an error. My input and error are as follows: *Input:* #!/bin/sh # run from directory where this script is cd

[QE-users] Error in electronic band structure calculation VCA vs substitution

2020-08-20 Thread Soumyadeep
Dear All, I am performing a electronic band structure calculation of NaFeAs with VCA and atomic substitution. VCA was done using upftools/virtual_v2.x with 50% Cu doping at Fe site to make NaFe0.5Cu0.5As. In atomic substitution method I replace one Fe atom by Cu to make NaFe0.5Cu0.5As

Re: [QE-users] VASP POTCAR into Quantum Espresso formats

2020-08-20 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 9:49 PM Ilias Miroslav, doc. RNDr., PhD. < miroslav.il...@umb.sk> wrote: Is there a viable way to convert these POTCAR files into format suitable > for Quantum Espresso ? > it depends upon your definition of "viable" :-) Converting one pseudopotential format into another

Re: [QE-users] ?= ?= Same run not accelerated when starting from converged rho and w

2020-08-20 Thread Pietro Davide Delugas
sorry  I missed your answer. maybe we are missing to load  the paw part of the density. It is still written in a file apart. we should open an issue on gitlab, otherwise we will forget about it again Pietro On 8/18/20 10:45 AM, Antoine Jay wrote: Dear Pietro, This happens always not only

Re: [QE-users] vDW error for scf calculation

2020-08-20 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:04 AM Neeraj Kulhari < neerajkulhari041...@gmail.com> wrote: with vdw_corr=grimme-d2 or vdw_corr=grimme-d3 I am getting below error > the correct syntax is vdw_corr='grimme-d2' or vdw_corr='grimme-d3' Paolo -- Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e

Re: [QE-users] problem whem more than 1000 k-points

2020-08-20 Thread aritz leonardo liceranzu
Yes I think so. It was a while ago and I remember that it drove me crazy. Pw.x would start normally but it would stop without crashing, like waiting for input. I remember that I fixed it as I have explained. By the way, it also happened to me that the problem would show only if I exceeded

Re: [QE-users] problem whem more than 1000 k-points

2020-08-20 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
Let me understand: are you saying that there might be a problem with the so-called "here document" syntax: pw.x < EOF long input here EOF if the long input is too long? funny Paolo On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:53 AM aritz leonardo liceranzu wrote: > Dear Fanhao > > I have encountered the same

Re: [QE-users] How to determine degauss

2020-08-20 Thread Nicola Marzari
My suggestion is that 0.02 Ry of either mp or mv is a very good choice - with this smearing, make sure things are converged with respect to k-points. If the quantity you are after is very sensitive to details of the fermi energy, going to 0.015 or 0.01 Ry, but never below, is a

Re: [QE-users] problem whem more than 1000 k-points

2020-08-20 Thread aritz leonardo liceranzu
Dear Fanhao I have encountered the same problem and the solution is easy. It doesn't have anything to do with QE. Simply create an independent nscf input file that contains the big list of kpoints. Do not create the nscf input file within the same job submission script using EOF. Then

Re: [QE-users] Error in installing thermo_pw 1.2.1 with QE-6.5

2020-08-20 Thread Pietro Davide Delugas
sorry but isn't this https://www.mail-archive.com/users@lists.quantum-espresso.org/msg38069.html an answer to the same question posted by  you ? If the case the answer didn't work would be more useful to continue with the same thread. Pietro On 8/20/20 9:58 AM, Pooja Vyas wrote: While I try

Re: [QE-users] Error in installing thermo_pw 1.2.1 with QE-6.5

2020-08-20 Thread Andrea Dal Corso
This is a well known problem corrected in commit cfae773 of March 3 2020. You can make the same changes on thermo_pw 1.2.1. You need to change 3 files, or you can update to the 1.3.0 version that also works with QE-6.5 and has already the corrections. Andrea On Thu, 2020-08-20 at 13:28 +0530,

[QE-users] vDW error for scf calculation

2020-08-20 Thread Neeraj Kulhari
Dear QE Users I am running a layered material with QE-6.5 version. As my system is a layered material so I need to include vdw corrections. I do not face any error when I run this job without vdw but with vdw_corr=grimme-d2 or vdw_corr=grimme-d3 I am getting below error Parallel version

[QE-users] Error in installing thermo_pw 1.2.1 with QE-6.5

2020-08-20 Thread Pooja Vyas
While I try to install thermo_pw, on giving the command "make thermo_pw", I get following error, test -d bin || mkdir bin ( cd clib ; make TLDEPS= all || exit 1 ) make[1]: Entering directory '/home/pooja/q-e-qe-6.5/clib' make[1]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. make[1]: Leaving directory

Re: [QE-users] problem whem more than 1000 k-points

2020-08-20 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
But when I increase to 12*12*12=1728 k-points, the  program does not really run, there is no output or error. I have increased the nkp in Module/parameter.f90  to 10, You "fix" would not help, and will in fact make things worst. If you exceed nkp the code will stop immediately with an

Re: [QE-users] problem whem more than 1000 k-points

2020-08-20 Thread Pietro Davide Delugas
Hi which version of the code are you using ? In the last version npk is already set to 4. an easy solution could be to split the calculation in 2 or 3 independent calculations in which you compute a part of the k-points. It might be a little be awkward to collect the results afterwards