results of ORCA
and Gaussian for molecules in the case S = I = 1/2. I can re-check that.
Best.
Davide
On 12/18/20 10:22 AM, Gregor Mali wrote:
> Hello.
>
>
> Isotropic hyperfine coupling constants A_iso, calculated by QE-GIPAW, can
> differ
> by a large factor from A_iso
to spin-density at
the position of a nucleus divided by . is the maximum value of the z
component. What is the definition of A_iso in QE-GIPAW? Is it perhaps
proportional to spin-density multiplied by S(S+1)/?
Thanks in advance!
Gregor Mali
National Institute of Chemistry
Ljubljana
Gregor
Gregor Mali
National Institute of Chemsitry
Hajdrihova 19
SI-1001 Ljubljana
Slovenia
___
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum
Dear Emine and Davide,
Thank you for your informative answers.
Gregor
> -Original Message-
> From: pw_forum-bounces at pwscf.org
> [mailto:pw_forum-bounces at pwscf.org] On Behalf Of Emine Kucukbenli
> Sent: 7. september 2011 14:09
> To: pw_forum at pwscf.org
> Subject: Re: [Pw_forum]
(or
if one does not have a proper gipaw pseudopotential for that atomic
species)?
Best regards.
Gregor
Gregor Mali
Kemijski institut/National Institute of Chemistry
Hajdrihova 19
SI-1001 Ljubljana
tel. +386 1 47 60 412
fax +386 1 47 60 300
> -Original Message-
> From: pw_forum-b
: [Pw_forum] GIPAW and spin-density maps
>
>
> On Dec 9, 2009, at 9:01 , Gregor Mali wrote:
>
> > Are these reconstructed wavefunctions saved and can they be used by
> > postprocessing routines to generate spin-density maps?
>
> reconstructed wavefunctions are not s
, ...).
Are these reconstructed wavefunctions saved and can they be used by
postprocessing routines to generate spin-density maps?
If yes, is the procedure then simply: 1. scf calculation, 2. gipaw
calculation, 3. postprocessing, where 'prefix' is kept the same in all
input files?
Thank you.
Gregor Mali
erm might be
antiferromagnetic arrangement of spins. In such an arrangement
contributions of neighbouring spins to dipole tensor could cancel one
another.)
Best regards.
Gregor
Gregor Mali
National Institute of Chemistry
Ljubljana, Slovenia
to abort calculation. I wonder if there is a way to circumvent the
problem, i.e. to perform calculation of hyperfine coupling anyway
(without calculating the coupling on La, of course).
Thank you very much for your help.
Gregor Mali
Gregor Mali
National Institute of Chemistry
Ljubljana
Slovenia
Davide,
> is your system metallic?
>
the material I am studying is Li2MnO3. It is an insulator, at low
temperature there might exist a weak antiferromagnetic interaction
between Mn ions.
In this material I predominantley wanted to calculate the hyperfine
interaction between Mn ion and Li
ibnd 51 linter: root not converged 0.369E-06
ik 1 ibnd 51 linter: root not converged 0.103E-06
...
Can anybody, please, give me some advice on how to circumvent the
problem?
Thak you very much.
Best regards.
Gregor Mali
Gregor Mali
Kemijski institut/National Institute
, not
documented in the INPUT_GIPAW.html file.
Best regards.
Gregor Mali
Gregor Mali
Kemijski institut/National Institute of Chemistry
Hajdrihova 19
SI-1001 Ljubljana
tel. +386 1 47 60 412
fax +386 1 47 60 300
for Li and Mn, convenient for use with
GIPAW.
Thank you very much in advance.
Gregor Mali
National Institute of Chemistry
Ljubljana, Slovenia
13 matches
Mail list logo