Re: [Pw_forum] lelfield=.true. with USPP , PAW and non-orthorhombic cells

2015-01-04 Thread Mostafa Youssef
Thank you Prof. Giannozzi. I tested running PWscf to calculate the ground state of monoclinic ZrO2 under finite homogeneous electric field using PAW PP. I could not find error messages in the output file to warn against using PAW PP. After the first electronic step, I can see the Berry phase

Re: [Pw_forum] lelfield=.true. with USPP , PAW and non-orthorhombic cells

2015-01-04 Thread Mostafa Youssef
Thank you Prof. Giannozzi. I tested running PWscf to calculate the ground state of monoclinic ZrO2 under finite homogeneous electric field using PAW PP. I could not find error messages in the output file to warn against using PAW PP. After the first electronic step, I can see the Berry phase

Re: [Pw_forum] lelfield=.true. with USPP , PAW and non-orthorhombic cells

2015-01-04 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Tue, 2014-12-30 at 07:36 +, Mostafa Youssef wrote: > I wonder whether applying finite homogeneous electric field in PWscf > supports: > > (1) USPP > (2) PAW PP > (3) Non-orthorhombic cells as a rule, any attempt to perform a calculation for a non-implemented case should result in an

[Pw_forum] lelfield=.true. with USPP , PAW and non-orthorhombic cells

2015-01-04 Thread Mostafa Youssef
>From the header of the file, bp_c_phase.f90, I can see that only USPP and NCPP > are supported when applying a homogeneous electric field in PWscf. But I >still could not resolve whether non-orthorhombic cells are supported. Any >hints are appreciated. Thank you, Mostafa Youssef MIT

[Pw_forum] lelfield=.true. with USPP , PAW and non-orthorhombic cells

2014-12-29 Thread Mostafa Youssef
Dear all, I wonder whether applying finite homogeneous electric field in PWscf supports: (1) USPP (2) PAW PP (3) Non-orthorhombic cells Thank you, Mostafa Youssef MIT ___ Pw_forum mailing list Pw_forum@pwscf.org