[QE-users] Problems with Fe ONCV pseudopotential part 2

2020-10-14 Thread Sasha Fonari
Hi All, Following the original thread: https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/2020-September/045902.html I've confirmed that oncvpsp version 3.1.1, indeed creates a ghost state, I've created an issue here: https://github.com/oncvpsp/oncvpsp/issues/4 Hopefully someone replies there

Re: [QE-users] Problems with Fe ONCV pseudopotential

2020-10-01 Thread Nicola Marzari
Related to this, we found a number of ghosts in the SG15, liaised with Francois, and that led to a number of updates in SG15.1 . Those are clearly visible in the band structure plots and matrix errors on the SSSP page. E.g. compare SG15 and SG15.1:

Re: [QE-users] Problems with Fe ONCV pseudopotential

2020-10-01 Thread Christoph Wolf
There is a "known problem" (known at least to Don Hamann, the creator of the ONCV), I will paste part of a conversation I had with him a few years ago pertaining to the same problem: " The Fe SG15 input data must have been on the "hairy edge" of ghost behavior. A small change of the local

Re: [QE-users] Problems with Fe ONCV pseudopotential

2020-09-30 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 2:30 PM mkondrin wrote: May be "ONCV potentials" link in the QE site > (https://www.quantum-espresso.org/pseudopotentials) should be upgraded? > the previous link was selected because it provided PP files with pseudo-atomic orbitals. The last point of the README of

Re: [QE-users] Problems with Fe ONCV pseudopotential

2020-09-30 Thread mkondrin
On 29.09.2020 15:41, Lorenzo Paulatto wrote: Many thanks again, Lorenzo. I believe I have downloaded ONCV pseudopotentials from the link in the official QE site (https://github.com/pipidog/ONCVPSP). It might be outdated, at least psedopotential files in it have no version number. > The

Re: [QE-users] Problems with Fe ONCV pseudopotential

2020-09-29 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
Many thanks again, Lorenzo. I believe I have downloaded ONCV pseudopotentials from the link in the official QE site (https://github.com/pipidog/ONCVPSP). It might be outdated, at least psedopotential files in it have no version number. > The latest version of > SG15 pseudopotentials can be

Re: [QE-users] Problems with Fe ONCV pseudopotential

2020-09-29 Thread Nicola Marzari
Dear MV, you can find the tests for the SG15 pseudos on the SSSP pseudopotentials page - I checked the Fe, and it doesn't have any ghosts, at least in the elemental bulk form. nicola On 29/09/2020 12:59, mkondrin wrote: On 29.09.2020 14:15, Lorenzo Paulatto

Re: [QE-users] Problems with Fe ONCV pseudopotential

2020-09-29 Thread mkondrin
On 29.09.2020 14:15, Lorenzo Paulatto wrote: Thank you for your exhaustive and enlightening comment. I would rather stick to the abinit version of ONCV pseudopotentials. I really don't know which version I am using (at least I haven't managed to find the version number in the ONCVPSP folders).

Re: [QE-users] Problems with Fe ONCV pseudopotential

2020-09-29 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
*-123.5858-123.5848-123.5814-123.5812-123.5812-123.5812-123.5812 P.S. the "***" mean that there is an eigenvalue more negative than -999 eV, it is the ghost state which manages to make itself orthogonal to the repulsive non-local projectors, to snuggle in the attractive local

Re: [QE-users] Problems with Fe ONCV pseudopotential

2020-09-29 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto
*-123.5858-123.5848-123.5814-123.5812-123.5812-123.5812-123.5812 That is quite obviously a sign of a ghost state of the pseudopotential. I found a similar one in the sg16-ONCV pseudo of Mn some time ago. However, the problem was only present with pseudos v 1.1 or 1.2 of the