Re: [QE-users] problem with number of atoms in pw.x

2020-09-14 Thread Marcelo Albuquerque
I got it. Thank you. * Marcelo Albuquerque* ___ Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu/quantum-espresso) users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] problem with number of atoms in pw.x

2020-09-13 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 12:43 PM Marcelo Albuquerque wrote: Would it be possible to run dist.x along with the input file to find out > which atom(s) is(are) positioned incorrectly? > not sure what you mean: dist.x reads the input file of pw.x. Have a look at PW/src/run_pwscf.f90 if you want to

Re: [QE-users] problem with number of atoms in pw.x

2020-09-12 Thread Marcelo Albuquerque
Dear all, Would it be possible to run dist.x along with the input file to find out which atom(s) is(are) positioned incorrectly? Best of luck. Em sáb, 12 de set de 2020 07:01, escreveu: > Send users mailing list submissions to > users@lists.quantum-espresso.org > > To subscribe or

Re: [QE-users] problem with number of atoms in pw.x

2020-09-11 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
Hi just guessing: the space-group machinery takes the provided Wyckoff positions, applies crystal symmetries, throws out translationally equivalent positions. It works also if positions are provided in the form (x,y,z) (wrt crystal axis), but you have to ensure that the Wyckoff site symmetry is

[QE-users] problem with number of atoms in pw.x

2020-09-11 Thread José Carlos Conesa Cegarra
Dear all, I have found a problem with the number of atoms resulting in a computation with pw.x. The essentials of the geometry specification are:   space_group=155, rhombohedral=.TRUE.   A=8.7018, B=8.7018, C=8.7018   cosAB=-0.0032742, cosAC=-0.0032742, cosBC=-0.0032742   nat=13, ntyp=4 ...