On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:58 PM Alex Schultz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:55 PM Fox, Kevin M wrote:
> >
> > The plan still is to support 7 and 8 in one version to facilitate
> migration?
> >
>
> I think the goal is to go back to Train and provide 8 packages for
> that once we've gotten
The plan still is to support 7 and 8 in one version to facilitate migration?
Thanks,
Kevin
From: dev on behalf of Alfredo Moralejo
Alonso
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2020 12:18 PM
To: RDO Developmen List; users@lists.rdoproject.org
Subject: Re: [rdo-dev]
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 3:55 PM Fox, Kevin M wrote:
>
> The plan still is to support 7 and 8 in one version to facilitate migration?
>
I think the goal is to go back to Train and provide 8 packages for
that once we've gotten the current master full converted. So you would
be able to target a
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 2:40 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:04 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to open a discussion about the status of RDO Ussuri
> repositories on CentOS7.
> >
> > As you know RDO and upstream teams (kolla,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:04 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to open a discussion about the status of RDO Ussuri repositories on
> CentOS7.
>
> As you know RDO and upstream teams (kolla, puppet-openstack, TripleO, TripleO
> CI, etc...) have been working to switch to
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:52 PM John Fulton wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:21 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:42 AM Alan Pevec wrote:
> >>
> >> > Glance was pinned in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/24257 with the
> >> > link to an upstream
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 4:21 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 8:42 AM Alan Pevec wrote:
>>
>> > Glance was pinned in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/24257 with the
>> > link to an upstream commit which maybe broke py2 at that time
>>
>> looking closer, this was
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:49 PM Wesley Hayutin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:56 AM Mike Burns wrote:
>
>> So, if I understand this right...
>>
>> * We're keeping the centos7 and centos8 versions of Ussuri consistent
>> * There is no actual build of the latest commits built on either
> Glance was pinned in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/24257 with the
> link to an upstream commit which maybe broke py2 at that time
looking closer, this was not py2 breakage, it was due to failing tests
in puppet-openstack-integration after native SSL support was
completely removed in Glance
> So in this case I'm asking for the first instance of such an
> exception. Could the cent7 Glance container be updated to have a newer
> version of Glance containing this change [2].
>
> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:glance-multistore
> [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705229/
In
>> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 9:05 AM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
>> wrote:
>>> What do you think about this plan?, is there any reason to keep CentOS 7
>>> artificially consistent and promoting at this point of the transition to
>>> CentOS 8?
There's a TripleO patch [1] blocked as a result. The
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 11:56 AM Mike Burns wrote:
> So, if I understand this right...
>
> * We're keeping the centos7 and centos8 versions of Ussuri consistent
> * There is no actual build of the latest commits built on either centos7
> or centos8
> * There is no possible way to have an Ussuri
So, if I understand this right...
* We're keeping the centos7 and centos8 versions of Ussuri consistent
* There is no actual build of the latest commits built on either centos7 or
centos8
* There is no possible way to have an Ussuri release on Centos7
Assuming the above is true, I would say to
13 matches
Mail list logo
