On 06/12/2011 19:59, C.M. Connelly wrote:
> "LL" == Ljubomir Ljubojevic
>
> LL> CentOS 6.x has PackageKit that does yum updates.
>
> Which would be great if we were talking about user workstations
> (where the users had root or sudo permissions), but it's not a
> reasonable solution for serv
All of the discussion regarding yum-updatesd, etc. has reminded me of the YUM
errors I've been plagued with for the last couple of weeks.
SL 6.1 enables cron updating by default and since Adobe released 11.1.102.55,
the 32-bit and 64-bit copies are out-of-sync. Been basically ignoring the
error
"LL" == Ljubomir Ljubojevic
LL> CentOS 6.x has PackageKit that does yum updates.
Which would be great if we were talking about user workstations
(where the users had root or sudo permissions), but it's not a
reasonable solution for servers or labs of managed machines.
Claire
*-*-*-*-*-*
Hi All,
Is there any chance of an update RPM for the wildly
out of date k3b that comes with Scientific Linux?
The current version is unable to cut a DVD ISO
(based on bad md5sums).
Many thanks,
-T
___
users mailing list
[email protected]
http:/
Hi all,
looking into mon-1.2.0-2.el5 i see an empty (two files instead 41)
/usr/lib64/mon/mon.d/ directory.
The spec-file has a disabled mon.d/*.monitor install line.
Just curious about the reason?
Thanks
LF
___
users mailing list
[email protected]
Vreme: 12/06/2011 01:08 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia piše:
>
> Note that CentOS has only released CentOS 6.0, and still has not
> released 6.1. If you want 6.1, I'm afraid you need to switch to
> Scientific Linux or buy RHEL licenses.
>
I forgot to comment on this. For those not in the loop, CentOS 6.1 i
