Re: [RCU] Release 0.9-beta ready for download

2013-01-15 Thread Steve Perkins
Have been doing a little testing in my test environment. No problems to note so far. Love the new Reply/View/Compose in new window. Something I've wanted for a long time instead of all those tabs, and that really streamlines using Roundcube. Keep up the good work guys. Cheers Steve On

Re: [RCU] [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download

2013-01-15 Thread Philip Rhoades
People, I know it is bad form to reply to yourself but now I have found a few issues: - PDFs don't seem to open in another tab anymore - when I reply in a new window the mail is not marked as read and - the mail item is not marked with a little replied to arrow Regards, Phil. On

Re: [RCU] Line wrapping f*cked up upon forwarding - why?

2013-01-15 Thread Kaz Kylheku
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:13:25 +0100, Michael Heydekamp listu...@freexp.de wrote: xxxä x xxx x xxxäx xx x xx xx xx. x x xx xx.xx. xx , xx xxx xx xxx xxßxx, x xxx xx xxx xxx

Re: [RCU] [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download

2013-01-15 Thread A.L.E.C
On 01/15/2013 04:59 PM, Philip Rhoades wrote: - PDFs don't seem to open in another tab anymore What browser? Is there any PDF plugin installed? In 0.9 we have a pdf plugin detection, if it's not found pdf files are not displayed inline. -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak LAN Management System

Re: [RCU] [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Am 15.01.2013 16:59, schrieb Philip Rhoades: - when I reply in a new window the mail is not marked as read and I can't confirm that. What's your setting under Mark previewed messages as read in the Mailbox View section?? - the mail item is not marked with a little replied to arrow Well,

[RCU] Reply-To issues again (was: [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download)

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
We had a similar discussion already a while ago (in the dev list, I believe). I'm not sure if it was exactly the same scenario or issue, but anyway, here we go again: When replying to a message in any of the Roundcube lists, not only me is used to simply click the Reply to sender button. Usually,

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

2013-01-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.01.2013 19:40, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: We had a similar discussion already a while ago (in the dev list, I believe). I'm not sure if it was exactly the same scenario or issue, but anyway, here we go again: When replying to a message in any of the Roundcube lists, not only me is

[RCU] Why is From at the beginning of a line always preceded with a quote char? (was: Reply-To issues again)

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
On 15.01.2013 19:40, Michael Heydekamp wrote: From my point of view, you shouldn't and can't expect the Roundcube user to first inspect all headers before clicking the Reply button. [...] See subject. Quoting From is mbox specific, AFAIR, but what do we have to do with mbox...? The much

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
On 15.01.2013 19:48, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 15.01.2013 19:40, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: A reply to the message quoted below (and attached) does NOT go to the list upon clicking the Reply to sender button - it goes to the address stated in the Mail-Reply-To: header instead - but, even worse,

[RCU] Quoted blank lines are deleted upon replying (was: [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download)

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
As anyone can see, replying to the message quoted below (and attached) does delete all quoted (!) blank lines in Thomas' announcement. I raised a similar issue (in a different way) in the dev list already (07.01.2013, 00:02, Subject Editing draft message does delete blank (and only blank?) quoted

Re: [RCU] Quoted blank lines are deleted upon replying (was: [Roundcube Announce] Release 0.9-beta ready for download)

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Grmpf, I attached the wrong message, sorry. Correct message now attached. When replying to it, all blank quoted lines get lost. -- Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany Am 15.01.2013 20:39, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: As anyone can see, replying to the message quoted below

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

2013-01-15 Thread Cor Bosman
Correct to me is what is defined as a standard in RFCs. Unless I'm blind or dumb (or both), I can't see that Mail-Reply-To: is standardized in any RFC. If I should be wrong, please point me to the relevant RFC. Plenty of things on the internet happen without RFCs. Generally before such a

[RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #1.1 - please ignore

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Entry under Identities/Reply-To: -- Michael Heydekamp listu...@freexp.de Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder): - Reply-To: Michael Heydekamp

Re: [RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #1.2 - please ignore

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Entry under Identities/Reply-To: -- Michael Heydekamp listu...@freexp.de Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder): - Reply-To: Michael Heydekamp

[RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #2.1 - please ignore

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Entry under Identities/Reply-To: -- Michael Heydekamp listu...@freexp.de, Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder):

Re: [RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #2.2 - please ignore

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Entry under Identities/Reply-To: -- Michael Heydekamp listu...@freexp.de, Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the Drafts folder):

Re: [RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #2.2 - please ignore

2013-01-15 Thread Reindl Harald
what the hell can you PLEASE test your roundcube setup OFFLIST if roundcube adds whatever header there is no need to bother 100,1000... people with your tests to figure it out and if not it is off-topic at all signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Am 15.01.2013 22:05, schrieb Cor Bosman: But why are you saying roundcube is the one adding it? Because it's a fact. See previous test mails. I dont see it in your replies. Sure, because unlike other users, I don't set any Reply-To: (and therefore Mail-Reply-To:) at all. More analysis

Re: [RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #2.2 - please ignore

2013-01-15 Thread Michael Heydekamp
Am 15.01.2013 23:58, schrieb Reindl Harald: what the hell can you PLEASE test your roundcube setup OFFLIST No. if roundcube adds whatever header One of the questions was if the list does change/add any headers. And it DOES. Go to bed, Harald, and have a good night. Cheers, -- Michael

Re: [RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #2.2 - please ignore

2013-01-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 16.01.2013 00:09, schrieb Michael Heydekamp: Am 15.01.2013 23:58, schrieb Reindl Harald: what the hell can you PLEASE test your roundcube setup OFFLIST No. then please unsubscribe or spam a list where i am not subscribed - unbelieveable what you are you do in an amateurish way on

Re: [RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #1.1 - please ignore

2013-01-15 Thread Nora Farrell
Please remove me from this email list. Thank You On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Michael Heydekamp listu...@freexp.dewrote: Entry under Identities/Reply-To: -- Michael Heydekamp listu...@freexp.de Local headers prior sending (source of the message in the

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

2013-01-15 Thread Cor Bosman
On Jan 15, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Michael Heydekamp listu...@freexp.de wrote: Am 15.01.2013 22:05, schrieb Cor Bosman: But why are you saying roundcube is the one adding it? Because it's a fact. See previous test mails. I dont see it in your replies. Sure, because unlike other users, I

Re: [RCU] Reply-To issues again

2013-01-15 Thread A.L.E.C
On 01/15/2013 08:04 PM, Michael Heydekamp wrote: Roundcube decides to respect Mail-Reply-To: and to ignore Reply-To:. This chunk of code tells everything. What's wrong here in your opinion? $mailfollowup = $MESSAGE-headers-others['mail-followup-to']; $mailreplyto =

Re: [RCU] Test (Mail-)Reply-To #1.1 - please ignore

2013-01-15 Thread Louis Truong
Me too please unsubscribe me from this On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:52 AM, Nora Farrell nor...@gmail.com wrote: Please remove me from this email list. Thank You On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Michael Heydekamp listu...@freexp.dewrote: Entry under Identities/Reply-To: