Thanks! Understood much better to ask some experienced fellow than dig in
the pile of hay.
Berms B.
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Samuel Gougeon wrote:
> Le 28/01/2013 22:30, Berns Buenaobra a écrit :
>
> Hi Samuel:
>>
>> I'd like to understand the "$" inside the would mean from the scrip
>From the code excerpt provided it is difficult to see from where errors of
magnitude~=1e-15 might come from.
Could they be due to some round-off errors in the function:
calc_D_superp_dobcel? Please check the function details.
Have you run the code with a "clear" at the beginning of the program
Le 28/01/2013 22:30, Berns Buenaobra a écrit :
Hi Samuel:
I'd like to understand the "$" inside the would mean from the script?
This is the size of the object along the related direction:
http://help.scilab.org/docs/5.4.0/en_US/dollar.html
after
a = ones(7,3)
a(:,$) // is equivalent to a(
It means the last element of the vector/matrix.
/Stefan
On 2013-01-28 22:30, Berns Buenaobra wrote:
Hi Samuel:
I'd like to understand the "$" inside the would mean from the script?
Thanks,
Berns B.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Samuel Gougeon mailto:sgoug...@free.f
Hi Samuel:
I'd like to understand the "$" inside the would mean from the script?
Thanks,
Berns B.
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Samuel Gougeon wrote:
> Le 26/01/2013 17:00, constantina a écrit :
>
> Sorry, I know is a basic question, i now the answer in matlab but not in
> scilab Wh
I reinstalled Scilab and everything works fine now. The new features and
environment in this version are very nice. Thanks to all those who
contributed to its development. As a user only, I am grateful. Best
regards.
--
View this message in context:
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Help-files-se
Sorry I didn't clarify that: I define the initial random positions, I
store them in a variable, say pos_in, and then I call the functions (the
different versions) with pos_in as input, so the initial positions are
the same in every case.
On 28/01/13 14:07, Serge Steer wrote:
If the initial pos
Hi, i've got the same error type in function "plot" of "scilab 5.4" running
over "mountain lion"
e.g. (scilab help ode exampe)
function ydot=f(t, y)
ydot=y^2-y*sin(t)+cos(t)
endfunction
y0=0;
t0=0;
t=0:0.1:%pi;
y=ode(y0,t0,t,f);
plot(y,t)
executing with echo:
-->function ydot=f(t, y)
-->
If the initial position of your sphere are randomly set, it can be
normal than you do not have the same number of iteration from one
simulation to an other one.
can you check using
rand("seed",0)
to force identical initial points for your various tests.
Serge Steer
Le 28/01/2013 16:18, Ezequiel
yes, you're right, the correct word is "spike". My problem consist: a matrix
like [v,k1,k2], the first letter is "time", k1 and k2 are "values" of a
time series.
So... if I plot the values, Im gonna find "spikes" that means "errors,
happens the same with "zero" values... I have to eliminate the w
The algorithm essentially starts with a set of spheres in random positions
and in a relatively dense state, and runs an iterative process where the
spheres are moved in each iteration in order to reduce the overlaps.
The core of the script is more or less like this
superp=calc_D_superp_dobcel(
Hello,
> If I have a vector , por example M= rand(418,1)
Just a question of vocabulary,
are you lookng for peaks with a given width, such as
or for "one-pixel" wide peaks,
which are sometimes refered to as "spikes"?
For spikes, you can use the cade given by Samuel,
just removing the "pC".
If t
If I have a vector , por example M= rand(418,1) , how can I implement the
same procediment??
--
View this message in context:
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Peaks-and-positions-tp4025764p4025799.html
Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
_
Ezequiel,
I recommend you to create a minimal code example which reproduces the
problem you have at hands and to submit it to the users list for evaluation.
It will be easier to help you.
Best regards.
Rafael G.
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.scilab.org [mailto:users-boun..
Hello,
> Now, if I define another variable,
> the number of iterations to converge changes!
[...]
> the problem is that this difference propagates exponentially
Maybe you could send us a "minimal" script reproducing the problem?
Regards
--
Christophe Dang Ngoc Chan
Mechanical calculation eng
Hello, I am using some iterative algorithm defined as a function in a .sci
file, and I have the following problem: the iterations in the algorithm are
controlled by a given variable. Now, if I define another variable, (which DO
NOT affect the values of the control variable nor the way it is cal
Clément David-2 wrote
> Hello,It is possible to linearize a modelica model however I should
> compile(in the sense of producing an Xcos block from a modelica diagram)
> first.Just define "needcompile=4" before calling lincos and open
> anon-documented bug.
Thank you, that works indeed. I have open
The identification functions help pages can be found in the CACSD chapter
look at findABCD, findBD, findAC,...
but also imprep2ss, armax, ...
Serge Steer
Le 25/01/2013 18:18, AntonSeab a écrit :
Hi
It would be great if you could point me to some documentation for the
Identification Toolbox. Se
Hello,
this problem is fixed in the current developpement version of the
plotlib, a new version will be released this week.
S.
Le 28/01/13 08:52, Vincent COUVERT a écrit :
Hello,
It seems that this error is due to plotlib since the error message
indicates that the error occurred at line 46
Hello,
It is possible to linearize a modelica model however I should compile
(in the sense of producing an Xcos block from a modelica diagram) first.
Just define "needcompile=4" before calling lincos and open a
non-documented bug.
--
Clément
Le vendredi 25 janvier 2013 à 09:26 -0800, amiege a é
20 matches
Mail list logo
