Re: [Scilab-users] CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
  Dear,   A new time, Federico is right. Monsieur Pierre-Simon de Lapalce is a French man ==> so the variable of Laplace is p American are not France, so they use s Like Grafcet in FRANCE, which is a french conception and SFC in US and their copies several years later.   I've done my own

Re: [Scilab-users] CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Federico Miyara
Samuel, Just a detail: in some books the p variable is used as the Laplace variable, especially when working with normalized variables. For instance, a normalizad butterworth filter may pe presented as 1/(1 + 2*p + 2*p^2 + p^3) I recall Bildstein's book on Active filters. See also: https:/

Re: [Scilab-users] Nysquist instruction - fmin fmax parameters vectorized controlling

2019-10-31 Thread Samuel Gougeon
Le 31/10/2019 à 18:34, Pierre PERRICHON a écrit : Dear all, As said in the nyquist help instruction, it is possible to get a nyquist plan using this instruction nyquist( sl,[fmin,fmax] [,step] [,comments] [,symmetry]) ... and this example in the same doc : nyquist([Plant;Plant*PID],0.5,100

[Scilab-users] Nysquist instruction - fmin fmax parameters vectorized controlling

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
Dear all, As said in the nyquist help instruction, it is possible to get a nyquist plan using this instruction nyquist( sl,[fmin,fmax] [,step] [,comments] [,symmetry]) ... and this example in the same doc : nyquist([Plant;Plant*PID],0.5,100,["Plant";"Plant and PID corrector"]); Here, we see t

Re: [Scilab-users] k*Ts - tr: Re: CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
  Dear Samuel and Xcosers-scilabers   It's OK Sorry for the reply, my favorite outlook has broken today, and I have had to go on the orange plateform which is more difficult for me.   OK only one separator of course. This is perfect the "*" was for the dialog box, not for the final renderin

Re: [Scilab-users] k*Ts - tr: Re: CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Samuel Gougeon
Le 31/10/2019 à 15:29, Pierre PERRICHON a écrit :  Dear Samuel, if we replace Ts by k*Ts, what does it give? (we hope the same symbol than for .s Pierre, As written yesterday, we can't use different symbols/separators for distinct kind of left and right operands. If we chose one, it will

Re: [Scilab-users] Screenshot from Xcos

2019-10-31 Thread Becker , Sören
That would be great. Let me know, when you have done that. Thank you. Von: users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.scilab.org] Im Auftrag von Samuel Gougeon Gesendet: Donnerstag, 31. Oktober 2019 02:52 An: users@lists.scilab.org Betreff: Re: [Scilab-users] Screenshot from Xcos Le 30/10/2019 à 11:54, B

[Scilab-users] k*Ts - tr: Re: CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
  Dear Samuel, if we replace Ts by k*Ts, what does it give? (we hope the same symbol than for .s Sincerely       > Message du 31/10/19 15:11 > De : "Pierre PERRICHON" > A : "UsersmailinglistforScilab" > Copie à : > Objet : tr: Re: [Scilab-users] CLR design component is not clear in scil

[Scilab-users] tr: Re: CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
Dear all   I think this representation (Federico) is the best one and the most relevant. It is even better than the one proposed in Simulink. I sincerely and strongly hope it will be adopted Best regards Pierre   Here is the last Samuel proposal, the top of the top Very very nice idea ! That

Re: [Scilab-users] ?==?utf-8?q? save the variables except the functions

2019-10-31 Thread fujimoto2005
Dear Antoine, Thank you for your reply. I could fix the problem by your idea. Best regards, Masahiro Fujimoto -- Sent from: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Mailing-Lists-Archives-f2602246.html ___ users mailing list users@lists.scilab.org

[Scilab-users] Basic test Bode - Nyquist failed scilab 6.0.2

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
Hello   BUG DESCRIPTION: When entering "bode" then immediatly nyquist at the console, we get error at nyquist execution. ERROR LOG: -- Initialisation : Chargement de l'environnement de travail --> bode --> nyquist à la ligne 162 de la fonction nyquist ( C:\Program F

Re: [Scilab-users] How to know which is the system's font?

2019-10-31 Thread Samuel Gougeon
Le 31/10/2019 à 12:15, Samuel Gougeon a écrit : Le 30/10/2019 à 03:17, Chin Luh Tan a écrit : .../... --> my_font = xmlGetValues("//fonts/body/fonts", ["font-face", "font-name", "font-size", "item", "latex", "system"]) my_font  = !plain  Monospaced  13  Console  15  true  ! .../... But i do

Re: [Scilab-users] How to know which is the system's font?

2019-10-31 Thread Samuel Gougeon
Hello Chin Luh, Le 30/10/2019 à 03:17, Chin Luh Tan a écrit : Hi Samuel, I am not sure whether the information from the preference tab are the one you need, if so, perhaps it could be retrieved by: --> my_font = xmlGetValues("//fonts/body/fonts", ["font-face", "font-name", "font-size", "ite

Re: [Scilab-users] CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 x64 W10

2019-10-31 Thread Pierre PERRICHON
  Dear all, dear Samuel,   Many thanks for your gallery For me the better d       > Message du 31/10/19 00:16 > De : "Samuel Gougeon" > A : users@lists.scilab.org > Copie à : > Objet : Re: [Scilab-users] CLR design component is not clear in scilab 6.0.2 > x64 W10 > > Le 30/10/2019 à 2