Re: [Scilab-users] Reimann Zeta function

2021-11-29 Thread Lester Anderson
Thanks for the info. Sorry about the typo: Riemann! Now corrected. On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 at 19:35, Stéphane Mottelet wrote: > Hello, > > There is no implementation of the zeta function in Scilab. Beware of naive > ways to compute it. You can have a look to this page : > >

Re: [Scilab-users] Reimann Zeta function

2021-11-29 Thread Stéphane Mottelet
Hello, There is no implementation of the zeta function in Scilab. Beware of naive ways to compute it. You can have a look to this page : http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/Miscellaneous/zeta.html S. > Le 29 nov. 2021 à 09:39, Lester Anderson a écrit : > >  > Hello all, > > I am

Re: [Scilab-users] Reimann Zeta function

2021-11-29 Thread Claus Futtrup
Hi Lester Please be reminded of the correct spelling : Riemann Cheers, Claus On 29-11-2021 18:23, Lester Anderson wrote: Hi all, Found a bit of Matlab/Octave code to solve the Reimann Zeta function for values >= 0, not perfect but it's a start. Need to figure out how to deal with negative

Re: [Scilab-users] Reimann Zeta function

2021-11-29 Thread Lester Anderson
Hi all, Found a bit of Matlab/Octave code to solve the Reimann Zeta function for values >= 0, not perfect but it's a start. Need to figure out how to deal with negative values. Lester // Reimann Zeta function: valid for t >= 0 function f=F(x) f =

Re: [Scilab-users] Atoms toolbox : iodelay toolbox by S.steer

2021-11-29 Thread Samuel Gougeon
Le 05/10/2021 à 17:24, Lucien Povy a écrit : Hello all, With new version of Scilab >6.1? we cannot use iodelay toolbox : problem with %rd_string. Hello Lucien, Thanks for reporting this issue. It is now fixed, and the iodelay toolbox can now be installed and used with Scilab 6.1.x -->