Le 16 sept. 2013 à 20:50, Antoine Monmayrant antoine.monmayr...@laas.fr a
écrit :
Le 16/09/13 17:57, Calixte a écrit :
On 16/09/2013 15:18, Antoine Monmayrant wrote:
On 09/16/2013 02:05 PM, quantpa...@numericable.fr wrote:
j'ai executé
x=[0:0.1:2*%pi];plot(x,sin(x));
sur 5.4.1 cela
Le 03/09/13 17:27, Serge Steer a écrit :
Le 03/09/2013 12:20, hilife5 a écrit :
I want to know is there exist any way to get the list of objects like
variable names, matrices, plots that are present in scilab script file.
for script file, no but it is possible for functions using the
macrovar
Le 03/09/13 17:27, Serge Steer a écrit :
Le 03/09/2013 12:20, hilife5 a écrit :
I want to know is there exist any way to get the list of objects like
variable names, matrices, plots that are present in scilab script file.
for script file, no but it is possible for functions using the
macrovar
Hello,
try splin3d or linear_interpn.
S.
Le 03/06/13 16:21, Ariel a écrit :
Do you mean that he V values you have are not placed on a 3d grid,
but on randomly scattered (x, y, z) points?
Exactly.I have randomly scattered (x,y,z) points with corresponding
value V and I want to map those
You can do it with the macrovar primitive.
S.
Le 29/05/13 22:56, Adrien Vogt-Schilb a écrit :
you cannot.
But you can provide the function directly with the name of your
variable, and transform te name of the variable into the variable by
evaluating it...
function
Hello,
Le 13/05/13 16:38, Adrien Vogt-Schilb a écrit :
Hi
It is possible, just use
subplot(321)
subplot(322)
subplot(323)
subplot(324)
and then
subplot(313)
then you get margins that are not homogeneous (this is ugly), as you can
see it in the attached file scilab_subplot.png (although
Le 13/05/13 16:38, Adrien Vogt-Schilb a écrit :
Hi
It is possible, just use
subplot(321)
subplot(322)
subplot(323)
subplot(324)
and then
subplot(313)
On 13/05/2013 16:30, SCHULZ Wolfgang wrote:
Hello,
I want plot data and divided the plot region with the subplot command
in 6 regions
Hello,
this small script solves your problem :
fd=mopen('engine.in','r');
s=mgetl(fd);
mclose(fd);
data1=[];
for i=1:size(s,1)
w=strsplit(s(i),'/\s+/');
for j=1:size(w,1)
data1(i,j)=w(j);
end
end
[r,c]=find(data=='bore');
Sorry for the small typing errors
("data" instead of "data1") :
fd=mopen('engine.in','r');
s=mgetl(fd);
mclose(fd);
data1=[];
for i=1:size(s,1)
w=strsplit(s(i),'/\s+/');
for j=1:size(w,1)
data1(i,j)=w(j);
end
end
[r,c]=find(data1=='bore');
Le 13/03/13 18:57, sgoug...@free.fr a écrit :
Hello Stéphane,
De: Stéphane Mottelet stephane.motte...@utc.fr
Is it possible to declare a uint8 matrix without first declaring it as a
double ? ../..
Yes, you can do:
--ui = resize_matrix(uint8(0),5,3)
ui =
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0
Le 06/03/13 18:27, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
Le 06/03/2013 15:43, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit :
Le 06/03/13 15:30, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit :
Hello,
is parallel_run supposed to work under MacOS X (tested here with
Scilab 5.4.0) ?
There seems to be ideas about a fix for Darwin :
http
Hello,
is parallel_run supposed to work under MacOS X (tested here with Scilab
5.4.0) ?
--function a=g(arg1)
-- a=arg1*arg1
--endfunction
--
--res=parallel_run(1:10, g);
A previous error has been detected while loading libsciparallel.dylib:
!--error 999
Impossible
Le 06/03/13 15:30, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit :
Hello,
is parallel_run supposed to work under MacOS X (tested here with
Scilab 5.4.0) ?
--function a=g(arg1)
-- a=arg1*arg1
--endfunction
--
--res=parallel_run(1:10, g);
A previous error has been detected while loading libsciparallel.dylib
Le 06/03/13 15:30, Stéphane Mottelet a écrit :
Hello,
is parallel_run supposed to work under MacOS X (tested here with
Scilab 5.4.0) ?
--function a=g(arg1)
-- a=arg1*arg1
--endfunction
--
--res=parallel_run(1:10, g);
A previous error has been detected while loading libsciparallel.dylib
Hello,
Replacing the squared L2 norm by the L1 norm in the linear regression
gives a good robustness to outliers (cf. Donoho and al. papers). The
problem is then non differentiable but you can implement it by
iteratively reweighting the classical L2 method (IRLS method), or by
writing an
, to be the most effective
method to remove them.
Regards,
Rafael
-Original Message-
From: users-boun...@lists.scilab.org [mailto:users-boun...@lists.scilab.org]
On Behalf Of Stéphane Mottelet
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2013 10:14 AM
To: users@lists.scilab.org
Subject: Re: [Scilab-users] Surface
Le 26/02/13 17:45, Adrien Vogt-Schilb a écrit :
hi
is there any reasons why I can't type from a console:
scilab myfile.sce
and expect scilab to execute myfile.sce and redirect output to the
standard output?
I can almost to that with
scilab-cli -f
and
scilab-cli -e
but i still have to exit
Hello,
this problem is fixed in the current developpement version of the
plotlib, a new version will be released this week.
S.
Le 28/01/13 08:52, Vincent COUVERT a écrit :
Hello,
It seems that this error is due to plotlib since the error message
indicates that the error occurred at line
Le 19/12/12 11:17, Lamy Alain a écrit :
Hi,
Does anyone know how to perform efficiently an operation like :
u .^k
with:
u = [u1, u2, ..., un] // ui : real numbers
and:
k = [k1; k2; kp] // ki : positive integers
The result being :
[ u1^k1, u2^k1, ..., un^k1;
u1^k2, u2^k2, ..., un^k2;
Le 23/11/12 09:14, Orbeman a écrit :
Hello,
I would like to plot a 3d implicit surface defines with an equation like
f(x, y, z)=0. There's no parametric transformation and is not possible to
express for example z=g(x, y).
Does anyone have an idea ?
Thank a lot.
--
View this message in
Le 05/11/12 14:53, Adrien Vogt-Schilb a écrit :
On 05/11/2012 14:45, Paul Carrico wrote:
All,
Thanks for the feedback ...
... a basic plot shows the curve is monotonic (see attachment) ; I should plot
a 3D curve in order to study the influence of the exponents for example to
verify there's
601 - 621 of 621 matches
Mail list logo
