Re: [Scilab-users] question to surf()

2022-01-04 Thread P M
Yes, that helped. Thank you, Philipp Am Di., 4. Jan. 2022 um 14:37 Uhr schrieb Samuel Gougeon : > Le 04/01/2022 à 14:29, P M a écrit : > > ...indeed..no problems with Scilab 6.1.1 > > > Likely because this example needs a bigger Java heap used for graphics. > The default Java heap size has been

Re: [Scilab-users] question to surf()

2022-01-04 Thread Samuel Gougeon
Le 04/01/2022 à 14:29, P M a écrit : ...indeed..no problems with Scilab 6.1.1 Likely because this example needs a bigger Java heap used for graphics. The default Java heap size has been increased from 256 to 512 MB in 6.1.1, for this kind of example. If you still work with Scilab < 6.1.1,

Re: [Scilab-users] question to surf()

2022-01-04 Thread P M
...indeed..no problems with Scilab 6.1.1 Thank you, Philipp Am Di., 4. Jan. 2022 um 12:22 Uhr schrieb Heinz Nabielek < heinznabie...@me.com>: > SurfPlot is no problem here. > Scilab Version: 6.1.1.988271013 > macOS Catalina Version 10.15.7 > Heinz > > > > > On 04.01.2022, at 09:29, P M wrote:

[Scilab-users] question to surf()

2022-01-04 Thread P M
Dear, is there a limitation for surf(), when displaying big matrices? Background: Imagine an image of size 900 x 1500. Scilab crashes, when I try to display the image using surf(). - I know there is imshow, Matplot etc... - for some cases it is nice to use surf() and take the pixel values as