Hi Rafael
My problem is defined as a response function, where I use contour
integral to achieve the step response. Then I differentiate it to
achieve the impulse response. In essense I already "know" my response
function. It contains some special features (it could for example be a
-Original Message-
From: Claus Futtrup
Sent: Sunday, September 16, 2018 5:15 PM
To: users@lists.scilab.org
Subject: Re: [Scilab-users] Frequency response
Hi Tim
So, this is complicated.
I admitted from the very beginning, it's probably just me that doesn't
know how to read
I didn't answer about ZPK because I didn't know either!
It's not so much a Scilab thing as -- are you getting the signal
processing right?
On Sun, 2018-09-16 at 18:15 +0200, Claus Futtrup wrote:
> Hi Tim
>
> >So, this is complicated.
>
> I admitted from the very beginning, it's probably just
Hi Tim
ZPK can mean many things (Google Search, I suppose) ... but after search
I understand it's something with Zero Pole ... don't know what the
letter K stands for, though.
What I like about the Matlab example is that random data is generated to
represent the impulse response, so this
Hi Claus,
In your script, the response function resp(s) is definitely not a simple LTI
system, not even a ratio of polynomials, because of the logarithmic term.
I am not an expert but I suspect that such highly non-linear transfer functions
are not handled by the standard Scilab DSP tools such
Hi Tim
>So, this is complicated.
I admitted from the very beginning, it's probably just me that doesn't
know how to read the Scilab manual. It cannot be complicated for someone
who knows and/or understand the manual.
BTW, I also notice that nobody answered the question what ZPK means? ...
