Hi Stephane,
At the moment I am just trying to understand how Scilab works with triple
integration of f(x,y,z) with limits for xyz.
Lester
--
Sent from:
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Mailing-Lists-Archives-f2602246.html
___
users
Hello all,
An update on a solution. Following e-mail correspondence with a fellow
Scilab user (Javier Domingo), he has worked out a general solution to
vectorising the X,Y,Z arrays for the tetrahedrons required by int3d. So
taking this part of the code and adding a call to int3d within a function
Hello,
I am also in favour of including this function in Scilab, with an “improved”
name. However, as far as I know, an inset has very frequently its own pair of
axes, as opposed to a ticks-switching in (only one of) the axes. Thus, I would
not recommend a name with “inset” and reserve it for
Hi Lester,
If I understand well, you are only interested by integrating on
[x1,x2] x [y1,y2] x [z1,z2]
and not a general volume, that's it ?
S.
Le 02/04/2021 à 11:53, arctica1963 a écrit :
Hello all,
An update on a solution. Following e-mail correspondence with a fellow
Scilab user (Javier
Hi Stephane,
Thanks for the information and methodology, useful to know. Learn something
new all the time with Scilab!
Kind regards
Lester
--
Sent from:
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Mailing-Lists-Archives-f2602246.html
___
users
Hello Samuel, hello all,
First thanks for the request for inclusion, that’s always good to have more
features into Scilab itself. However, I have a few remarks regarding this
function.
1. The function name plotplots() does not seem well known nor easy to find ;
after a few research I
Quick query re: your code,
How is the index (i) defined?
i = [5 8 2 3
5 8 2 6
5 8 3 7
5 2 3 1
2 3 8 4]';
Just trying to fully understand your method.
Lester
--
Sent from:
http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Mailing-Lists-Archives-f2602246.html
They are the number of the vertices of the cube, as generated by ndgrid:
--> [(1:8)' x(:) y(:) z(:)]
ans =
1. 0. 0. 0.
2. 1. 0. 0.
3. 0. 1. 0.
4. 1. 1. 0.
5. 0. 0. 1.
6. 1. 0. 1.
7. 0. 1. 1.
8. 1. 1. 1.
S.
Le 02/04/2021
On 02/04/2021 12:16, CRETE Denis wrote:
Hello,
I am also in favour of including this function in Scilab, with an
“improved” name. However, as far as I know, an inset has very
frequently its own pair of axes, as opposed to a ticks-switching in
(only one of) the axes. Thus, I would not
Le 02/04/2021 à 12:53, arctica1963 a écrit :
Hi Stephane,
At the moment I am just trying to understand how Scilab works with triple
integration of f(x,y,z) with limits for xyz.
Ok, when you say "limits" for xyz you mean that each variable varies in
a given constant interval, that's what I
Dear all,
Thanks for your first feedbacks. I am somewhat answering in the body of
this message:
Le 02/04/2021 à 14:49, Antoine Monmayrant a écrit :
On 02/04/2021 12:16, CRETE Denis wrote:
Hello,
I am also in favour of including this function in Scilab, with an
“improved” name. However,
Le 02/04/2021 à 11:19, Clément David a écrit :
../..
2. I found the need to have a second axe (example 1) different to
recompute ticks (example 2). I might have miss something, could
you clarify these two usage ?
I am afraid to not understand your query. Could you elaborate, please?
12 matches
Mail list logo
