Re: [Scilab-users] Xcos block label is deleted when block is part of a subsystem

2017-02-24 Thread Paul Bignier 


Hello Nils,

I filed a bug for your report, we're looking into it, turns out the 
labels don't work for simple blocks either!


Thanks your your feedback,
Regards,
Paul

On 11/08/2016 10:15 AM, nils.leimb...@dlr.de wrote:


Hello!

I have stumbled upon the problem. A block label in Xcos will be 
deleted, if it is part of a subsystem (inside a superblock) and 
altered outside of Xcos.


The label data is stored in block.graphics.id (inside of the 
respective subsystem of a superblock; so superblock.model.rpar). When 
I alter the content of that field, or even pull the scs_m data from 
Xcos and try to reopen / reload it using the xcos(scs_m) command, all 
labels inside of superblocks are deleted.


I am not sure if this is a bug or wether I am missing a key part to 
the process, but I hope this can be fixed as it is essential for my 
work in progress, that I can add labels to blocks on all layers of the 
simulation and that these will be considered when loading the diagram 
into Xcos.


Best regards

Nils Leimbach



___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users


--
Paul BIGNIER
Development engineer
---
Scilab Enterprises
143bis rue Yves Le Coz - 78000 Versailles, France
Phone: +33.1.80.77.04.68
http://www.scilab-enterprises.com

___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [Scilab-users] Strange behaviour of the auto-indent ctrl + i

2017-02-24 Thread Paul Bignier 


Hi Pierre,

The handling of comments looks buggy indeed, could you please report a 
bug  
with the test-case?

Thanks!

Regards,
Paul

On 02/24/2017 10:01 AM, Pierre Vuillemin wrote:

Hello all,

I've just realised that block-comments are now available in Scilab 6 
and I find it quite convenient. I've noticed strange behaviour when 
using the auto-indent tool ctrl + i in scinote though.


For instance with this code



// Author : Pierre Vuillemin (2017)
// License : GNU GPL

function problem = sopi_max(fun, varargin)
   /*
   Creates a maximisation problem.

   Calling Sequence
  problem = sopi_max(fun)
  problem = sopi_max(fun, c1, ..., cn)

   Parameters
  fun  : the objective function (sopiVar)
  ci   : constraints (sopiCst or list of sopiCst)
  problem  : the optimisation problem (sopiPro)

   See also
  sopi_var
  sopi_min
  sopi_solve
  sopi_example
   */
   problem = sopi_min(-fun, varargin(:))
endfunction


the auto-ident tool adds strange indentation to the endfunction + it 
suppress the indentation of the text withing the block comment. 
Shouldn't it behave as if // were used?


Regards,

Pierre
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users


--
Paul BIGNIER
Development engineer
---
Scilab Enterprises
143bis rue Yves Le Coz - 78000 Versailles, France
Phone: +33.1.80.77.04.68
http://www.scilab-enterprises.com

___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[Scilab-users] Strange behaviour of the auto-indent ctrl + i

2017-02-24 Thread Pierre Vuillemin 

Hello all,

I've just realised that block-comments are now available in Scilab 6 and 
I find it quite convenient. I've noticed strange behaviour when using 
the auto-indent tool ctrl + i in scinote though.


For instance with this code



// Author : Pierre Vuillemin (2017)
// License : GNU GPL

function problem = sopi_max(fun, varargin)
   /*
   Creates a maximisation problem.

   Calling Sequence
  problem = sopi_max(fun)
  problem = sopi_max(fun, c1, ..., cn)

   Parameters
  fun  : the objective function (sopiVar)
  ci   : constraints (sopiCst or list of sopiCst)
  problem  : the optimisation problem (sopiPro)

   See also
  sopi_var
  sopi_min
  sopi_solve
  sopi_example
   */
   problem = sopi_min(-fun, varargin(:))
endfunction


the auto-ident tool adds strange indentation to the endfunction + it 
suppress the indentation of the text withing the block comment. 
Shouldn't it behave as if // were used?


Regards,

Pierre
___
users mailing list
users@lists.scilab.org
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users