One more detail: if the ylabel of one of the plots is not required, the
graph doesn't extend towards the left but has the same width as the
others. This is what one would expect from the use of xlabel: its
presence or absence shouldn't affect the height of the plot relative to
the other
Philipp,
Thanks! That's the reason indeed!
The workarounds do work but with pitfalls. With xstring() the label
moves around when zooming in or out, and xlabel takes too much space, in
fact saving space was the reason to place it only on the last plot.
Probably it would be possible to adapt
Hi Philip,
Here is a possible implementation for the next major release of Scilab (6.2)
https://codereview.scilab.org/#/c/21801/
Take a look at the video and tell me if it is OK for you. However, there
are still some glitches which have to fo be fixed (e,g, problems when
zooming in isoview
Hi Federico,
my best guess: In your example only subplot(4,1,4) gets the x_label
Since this needs space, the diagram is smaller.
Workaround:create label for x-axis via xstring
Or:
Assign a x_label for each subplot, but hide it.
This will assign "space" for the label, but it won't be
