Re: [Scilab-users] XCOS and RK45 Runge-Kutta 4(5)

Hello Hermes, > There were also differences > with the Block GAINBLK vs. GAINBLK_f. I think this does not make the > differences in results. Correct? These blocks only differs in their parameter settings. The behavior is the same and the simulation results should be similar. -- Clément

Re: [Scilab-users] XCOS and RK45 Runge-Kutta 4(5)

-- View this message in context: http://mailinglists.scilab.org/XCOS-and-RK45-Runge-Kutta-4-5-tp4036893p4036895.html Sent from the Scilab users - Mailing Lists Archives mailing list archive at

Re: [Scilab-users] XCOS and RK45 Runge-Kutta 4(5)

Hello my apologies The problem was when the block EXPBLK_m was incorrectly taken. I only notice it when comparing my scheme with that of You. There were also differences with the Block GAINBLK vs. GAINBLK_f. I think this does not make the differences in results. Correct? Thank you for your prompt

[Scilab-users] XCOS and RK45 Runge-Kutta 4(5)

Hello everyone, I try to reproduce what is shown on the following website: https://x-engineer.org/graduate-engineering/cad-cae/xcos/how-to-solve-integrate-a-differential-equation-in-xcos/#comment-51 And I have found big differences between the analytical solution and the integral in Xcos. This