Re: [Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

2020-12-07 Thread Samuel Gougeon
Hello Philipp, Le 07/12/2020 à 09:02, P M a écrit : Please enlighten meon my PC the current situation is like this: Scilab 6.1.0 Loading order 1: - scicv - IPCV --> in console: help imread --> img = imread(filename[,flag])    // hence the imread function from scicv is found /

Re: [Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

2020-12-07 Thread P M
Please enlighten meon my PC the current situation is like this: Scilab 6.1.0 Loading order 1: - scicv - IPCV --> in console: help imread --> img = imread(filename[,flag])// hence the imread function from scicv is found / used (?) --- Loading order 2: - IPCV - scicv --> in

Re: [Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

2020-12-04 Thread Chin Luh Tan
Hi Samuel, Thanks for your details explanations and examples, they are really helpful. Yes you're right, the functions loaded are base on what you have describe, not depending on the order the modules being loaded. Thanks for pointing this out. Regards, Chin Luh On Sat, 5 Dec 2020 at 02:37,

Re: [Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

2020-12-04 Thread Samuel Gougeon
Hello Chin Luh, Le 04/12/2020 à 01:57, Chin Luh Tan a écrit : Hi all, Stephane, Thanks for the quick  examples to illustrate this. Claus, as shown by Stephane, this could be now by ourselves now from our own modules. Stephane has illustrated a quick demo on this, while the one I was testing

Re: [Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

2020-12-03 Thread Chin Luh Tan
Hi all, Stephane, Thanks for the quick examples to illustrate this. Claus, as shown by Stephane, this could be now by ourselves now from our own modules. Stephane has illustrated a quick demo on this, while the one I was testing with is the copy of toolbox skeleton inside the Scilab contrib,

Re: [Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

2020-12-03 Thread Stéphane Mottelet
This is the way it works in scilab for libraries: mkdir lib1 mputl("function y=foo(x);y=x;end","lib1/foo.sci") genlib("lib1","lib1") mkdir lib2 mputl("function y=foo(x);y=2*x;end","lib2/foo.sci") genlib("lib2","lib2") lib("lib1") lib("lib2") -> lib1.foo(1) ans = 1. --> lib2.foo(1)

Re: [Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

2020-12-03 Thread Antoine Monmayrant
On 03/12/2020 02:10, TanCL wrote: Hi, my previous message seems like not able to get posted due to some reason, just to add some comment on this, I think the functions with same name under 2 different modules could be possibly called by: That is exactly how things are working in Ada:

Re: [Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

2020-12-03 Thread Claus Futtrup
Hi Tan I agree. The proposal, is it something we can do ourselves now, or will it require implementation into Scilab first? Thank you for resending. /Claus On 03-12-2020 02:10, TanCL wrote: Hi, my previous message seems like not able to get posted due to some reason, just to add some

Re: [Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

2020-11-24 Thread P M
Mh. Nice Idea. Maybe something like this is already possible? Install toolboxed but remove from autoloader. So scilab starts without toolboxed from atoms. The script includes than the command, which module shall be loaded. Thanks for the idea...i will try this. Philipp Am Dienstag, 24.

Re: [Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

2020-11-24 Thread Claus Futtrup
Hi all I imagine naming conflicts can occur across different ATOMS. How about a change where one has to specify which ATOMS module you're using when calling a function, such that both can coexist side-by-side ? I'm thinking Pythonic here, like if you import for example numpy, you can write

[Scilab-users] ipcv vs scicv

2020-11-24 Thread P M
Dear developers, as I have many scripts with "imread" I wonder if some time in the future duplicate functions names from IPCV and SCICV are going to be removed/changed. It's kind of disturbing to have to use atomsInstall/atomsRemove when using different scripts. I think this was discussed