Hello Morgan,
yes of course this works. I've been running pluto and charon on
the same physical machinee for years. pluto binds to UDP sockets
500 and 4500 and charon gets its packets via the socket-raw plugin.
Regards
Andreas
On 03/28/2012 12:35 AM, Morgan Yang wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I'm wonderi
Here's another question, and I hope it will be easier, more interesting, and
less lame than my last.
I see that both pluto and charon support the uniqueids option, which ensures
that each peer ID can only connect from one IP at a time. I have a situation
where some peers are generating multiple
Hello:
I'm wondering has ever ran both clients on the same machine
(non-VM) simultaneously, if its possible at all?
Much Thanks
Morgan
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.strongswan.org
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Hallelujah! Predictably, this was a comedy of errors, including syntax changes
in ipsec.secrets leading to a line getting lost. Also, mysteriously, strongSwan
was unable to parse the private key even when it was trying. Not sure why, as
it was fixed by simply washing it through `openvpn rsa` aga
Thank you :)
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Steffen [mailto:andreas.stef...@strongswan.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:30 AM
To: Mohammady Mahdy
Cc: users@lists.strongswan.org
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] Listing multiple IP addresses on the rightsubnet
The workaround is to define m
Hi Peter,
> I'm attaching the full control+controlmore logs from both versions in
> case anyone's interested (IP redacted). A diff shows them effectively
> identical until after the "full match" lines.
Actually, I think that the problem is caused by an earlier difference in
the logs:
4.4.0:
> lo
The workaround is to define multiple connections:
conn c1
also=c0
rightsubnet=10.122.193.172/32
auto=start
conn c2
also=c0
rightsubnet=110.124.196.172/32
auto=start
...
conn c0
left=..
leftid=..
right=..
rightid=..
...
resulting in a single
