Re: [strongSwan] High latency (satellite) link : what can we improve ?

2017-10-26 Thread Noel Kuntze
Hello, Hoggins: Please provide the full list of information that is listed on the HelpRequests page. It helps immensely in understanding what the actual problem is. In fact, it saves us about 99,9% of the guessing. Kind regards Noel [1]

Re: [strongSwan] High latency (satellite) link : what can we improve ?

2017-10-26 Thread Tom Rymes
Odd, it works fine for us. The tunnel is set up as routed, and once traffic destined for the other side of the tunnel shows up, the connection is established and all is well. You've reached the limit of my abilities, hopefully someone else can help. > On Oct 26, 2017, at 5:14 AM, Hoggins!

Re: [strongSwan] High latency (satellite) link : what can we improve ?

2017-10-26 Thread Hoggins!
[...] Connection is *not* automatically established when needed [...] Le 26/10/2017 à 10:31, Hoggins! a écrit : > With this in place, strongswan statusall shows that there are policies > loaded, but connection is automatically established when needed, > although I thought this would be the case.

Re: [strongSwan] High latency (satellite) link : what can we improve ?

2017-10-26 Thread Hoggins!
Hmm.. I might have an understanding problem regarding the auto=route setting. With this in place, strongswan statusall shows that there are policies loaded, but connection is automatically established when needed, although I thought this would be the case. Maybe there's another setting that would