Re: [strongSwan] vici initiator only or responder per connection

2020-04-07 Thread Naveen Neelakanta
Hi Tobias, Thank you for taking the time to reply to my request, How can I get the same behavior for Per connection via vici. I believe dropping the connection when global initiator_only is marked as yes is done in Charon code and not via iptables . Please guide me on the per-connection option

Re: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tunnel established but packets are not routed. V2 works.

2020-04-07 Thread Noel Kuntze
Hi, Nope, that's wrong. You need to enumerate all combinations of subnets so you have a specific CHILD_SA for each pair. IKEv1 can only handle one subnet per side in a single CHILD_SA. Kind regards Noel Am 07.04.20 um 16:38 schrieb Makarand Pradhan: > Good morning All, > > Following up on

Re: [strongSwan] ikeV1 tunnel established but packets are not routed. V2 works.

2020-04-07 Thread Makarand Pradhan
Good morning All, Following up on the issue. We need to manually add the route for ikev1. Would very much appreciate any pointers. Am kind of stuck on ikev1. Kind rgds, Makarand Pradhan Senior Software Engineer. iS5 Communications Inc. 5895 Ambler Dr, Mississauga, Ontario L4W 5B7 Main Line: 

[strongSwan] Any examples for route-based vti-ip4-in-ip6 ?

2020-04-07 Thread Thomas Rudolph
Hello, I'll try to setup net2net connection ip4-in-ip6. I have already working setup ip4-in-ip6 policy based, without vti interfaces. And also working setups with vti interface, ipv4-in-ipv4. But now I need any hints/examples to use vti interface for ipv4-in-ipv6. I looked at

Re: [strongSwan] received retransmit of response with ID 0, but next request already sent

2020-04-07 Thread Tobias Brunner
Hi Matt, > I've been trying to make a connection between my home PC and the > Watchguard XTM330 we have at the office. It seems that box supports IKEv2 (at least the GUI has a version dropdown field). If possible, switch to that version. > could anyone shed some light on this one for me ? 

Re: [strongSwan] vici initiator only or responder per connection

2020-04-07 Thread Tobias Brunner
Hi Naveen, > I see that we have a global " *initiator_only = yes/no* " configuration > in charon.conf, is it possible to configure this for per connection via > vici, so that the initiator is only responsible for initiating the > connection. That option is global because it causes any initial