Re: [strongSwan] Multiple IKEv2 proposals

2019-07-04 Thread Graham Bartlett (grbartle)
Hi Just to close the loop Noel replied unicast. But to answer your Q, I did read the man page (it's clear and explicitly says to use a ',' between proposals), but I was fat fingering the proposals and so it was failing hence I thought that it wasn't possible. Thanks for the help. cheers On

[strongSwan] Multiple IKEv2 proposals

2019-07-01 Thread Graham Bartlett (grbartle)
Hi Is it possible to send multiple IKEv2 proposals? The use case being, one with combined mode ciphers and the other without. Many thanks smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [strongSwan] (no subject)

2018-09-03 Thread Graham Bartlett (grbartle)
Hi Sandesh The offline dictionary PSK attack isn’t something new (people have known about this since last millennia!). In summary if you have a ‘strong’ PSK you’re safe.. But if you have an active MiTM as described in the paper then they can perform an offline brute force attack against