Re: [strongSwan] IPv6 (Link Local) Router Soliciations over VPN (for Windows 7)

2015-04-06 Thread Richard Laager
I've attached an updated patch, in `git format-patch` style. I've added a missing Makefile.am bit and updated this to apply against git HEAD. -- Richard From 73465ffb75656c47bcba1cfc25ed40dd35ead803 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Laager rlaa...@wiktel.com Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 00:11:39

Re: [strongSwan] IPv6 (Link Local) Router Soliciations over VPN (for Windows 7)

2015-04-01 Thread Richard Laager
https://wiki.strongswan.org/issues/817 is another example of this issue. On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 10:34 +0100, Martin Willi wrote: Doesn't have the Use default gateway on remote network in the Advanced... settings of the Internet Protocol Version 6 Networking Properties of your client connection

Re: [strongSwan] IPv6 (Link Local) Router Soliciations over VPN (for Windows 7)

2015-03-27 Thread Richard Laager
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 10:34 +0100, Martin Willi wrote: So you are suggesting to assign a link-lokal virtual IP, allow the client to do Router Solicitation to get an Advertisement, for which you anticipated the address and included it in your negotiated TS? Or the other way round? If that

[strongSwan] IPv6 (Link Local) Router Soliciations over VPN (for Windows 7)

2015-03-23 Thread Richard Laager
My colleague and I are trying to setup a road warrior VPN using IPsec and IKEv2. The goal is for unmodified Windows 7 (and up) to connect using the built-in VPN client. Dual-stack inside the VPN is a hard requirement, which is where we're running into problems. That is, IPv4 works fine, but IPv6