Re: [strongSwan] Error building 5.3.4

2015-11-20 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
On 18-11-2015 18:50, Andreas Hofmeister wrote: You probably need the linux kernel header files (for "linux/if_link.h" and "linux/neighbour.h"). See https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source Thanks, but I have the kernel-headers and kernel-xen-devel (as I'm building inside a Xen

Re: [strongSwan] Error building 5.3.4

2015-11-18 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
Just to add that I have successfully built all recent strongSwan versions up to 5.3.2 in the same environment without problems. ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.strongswan.org https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[strongSwan] Error building 5.3.4

2015-11-18 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
When buidling strongSwan 5.3.4 on CentOS 5.11 it exits with: libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../.. -I../../../../src/include -I../../../../src/libstrongswan -I../../../../src/libhydra -DROUTING_TABLE=220 -DROUTING_TABLE_PRIO=220 -rdynamic -g -O2 -Wall -Wno-format

[strongSwan] Duplicate checking: duplicheck and uniqueids not working

2015-07-26 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
I'm getting duplicate SAs: Routed Connections: nyc{1}: ROUTED, TUNNEL, reqid 1 nyc{1}: 10.71.4.0/24 === 172.30.98.0/25 Security Associations (1 up, 0 connecting): nyc[23]: ESTABLISHED 25 minutes ago, 47.11.120.10[par.xyz.com]...32.254.201.10[nyc.xyz.com] nyc{203}: INSTALLED, TUNNEL,

[strongSwan] Traffic selector not working as expected

2015-07-05 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
I'm trying to restrict the traffic selector to GRE/BGP: rightsubnet=%dynamic[gre/bgp] auto=route But GRE-encapsulated BGP traffic doesn't go through. However, if I change the TS to: rightsubnet=%dynamic[gre] auto=route BGP (and other GRE-encapsulated traffic)

Re: [strongSwan] How to tunnel traffic towards the public IP of the remote gateway?

2015-04-18 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
Cheers. It worked beautifully. Tiago On 17-04-2015 08:27, Martin Willi wrote: Hi, Does %dynamic work in net2net? Or only in road-warrior scenarios? If any has been negotiated, %dynamic resolves to the virtual IP for that endpoint. If not, it resolves to the IKE endpoint address. It can

[strongSwan] How to tunnel traffic towards the public IP of the remote gateway?

2015-04-16 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
My understanding is that only traffic towards the subnets declared in: rightsubnet is tunnelled and, therefore, encrypted. Whereas traffic towards the IP address of the remote gateway declared in: right is routed outside of the tunnel. Example: Gateway Sun address (WAN-facing):

Re: [strongSwan] dpd and INFORMATIONAL requests

2014-04-24 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
strongSwan 5.1.3 peers, I get dpd actions, if there is no IPsec traffic between the two hosts for the set time frame. Regards, Noel Kuntze GPG Key id: 0x63EC6658 Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658 Am 23.04.2014 18:24, schrieb Tiago Vasconcelos: Hi Noel That's exactly what I

[strongSwan] dpd and INFORMATIONAL requests

2014-04-23 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
I've enabled dpd by adding the following lines to the conn %default section of ipsec.conf: dpdaction=restart dpddelay=10 Judging from the output of 'ipsec statusall' I presume dpd is set: ut01: child: 10.12.0.0/15 === 10.14.0.0/15 TUNNEL, dpdaction=restart But in the logs,

Re: [strongSwan] dpd and INFORMATIONAL requests

2014-04-23 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
to log level 1. Regards, Noel kuntze GPG Key id: 0x63EC6658 Fingerprint: 23CA BB60 2146 05E7 7278 6592 3839 298F 63EC 6658 Am 23.04.2014 17:12, schrieb Tiago Vasconcelos: I've enabled dpd by adding the following lines to the conn %default section of ipsec.conf: dpdaction=restart

Re: [strongSwan] Clients disconnect after 240 minutes

2013-02-04 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
Thank you for the tips, Andreas and Martin. Unfortunately, I'm still struggling with the same problem. 'reauth=no' didn't help, BTW. In my ipsec.conf I have currently: conn win7 ike=aes256-sha1-modp1024! esp=aes256-sha1! dpddelay=300s

Re: [strongSwan] Clients disconnect after 240 minutes

2013-02-04 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
More accurately, the clients loose connection every 266 minutes. Tiago On 26/11/12 17:37, Tiago Vasconcelos wrote: I have strongSwan 4.6.4 running on a RHEL 5. Some of the users complain the connection drops after approximately 240 minutes. These users happen to be on Windows 7. Does

[strongSwan] Clients disconnect after 240 minutes

2012-11-26 Thread Tiago Vasconcelos
I have strongSwan 4.6.4 running on a RHEL 5. Some of the users complain the connection drops after approximately 240 minutes. These users happen to be on Windows 7. Does anyone know why this is happening? Who is forcing the disconnect: the server or the client? Tiago