Re: [strongSwan] Issuse with VTI packet forwarding

2017-11-30 Thread Noel Kuntze
Hello, The IPs of the VTI need to correspond to the IPs of the SAs (not the policies). The exception (0.0.0.0) is described in the wiki article I linked you before. Kind regards Noel On 30.11.2017 02:50, Naveen Neelakanta wrote: > Hi Noel, > > Thanks i got the VTI working after i change the

Re: [strongSwan] Issuse with VTI packet forwarding

2017-11-29 Thread Naveen Neelakanta
Hi Noel, Thanks i got the VTI working after i change the vti local and remote ip to match to the SPD IPs. How ever Is it possible to configure VTI interface with different Ip other than the policys. Working config: ip tunnel add ipsec0 local 10.24.18.209 remote 10.24.18.35 mode vti okey 32

Re: [strongSwan] Issuse with VTI packet forwarding

2017-11-29 Thread Noel Kuntze
Hi, Please follow the RouteBasedVPN article[1] to the letter and keep your routes in the main routing table to keep it simple. As soon as you have a working setup, THEN you can start making changes. Kind regards Noel [1] https://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/RouteBasedVPN On

[strongSwan] Issuse with VTI packet forwarding

2017-11-29 Thread Naveen Neelakanta
Hi All, Need some guidance and help in getting the traffic routed via VTI ( ipsec0 ) interface.I am using the VTI interface to just mark the traffic and forward. I am not able to get the traffic forwarding via VTI( ipsec0) interface and getting the traffic marked, so that it gets protected. i

[strongSwan] Issuse with VTI packet forwarding .

2017-11-28 Thread Naveen Neelakanta
Hi All, Need some guidance and help in getting the traffic routed via VTI ( ipsec0 ) interface.I am using the VTI interface to just mark the traffic and forward. I am not able to get the traffic forwarding via VTI( ipsec0) interface and getting the traffic marked, so that it gets protected. i