Re: [strongSwan] incorrect notification data for critical invalid payload type

2012-09-28 Thread gowrishankar
Hi Andreas, I could not follow up on your reply by that time. On Sunday 01 July 2012 06:43 PM, Andreas Steffen wrote: What do you mean by corrupted? To my unexperienced eyes the log shows that indeed a one-octet notification payload is sent containing the received and rejected value 0x2D which

Re: [strongSwan] incorrect notification data for critical invalid payload type

2012-09-28 Thread Tobias Brunner
Hi Gowri, Here, this payload is of 9 bytes as payload length also mentions correctly. But, my doubt is on notification data which is 2D. It is always 2D even if I set notification data on sending node (say 01). This value has nothing to do with the notification data, but with the payload type

Re: [strongSwan] incorrect notification data for critical invalid payload type

2012-09-28 Thread gowrishankar
Hi Tobias, On Saturday 29 September 2012 02:04 AM, Tobias Brunner wrote: Hi Gowri, Here, this payload is of 9 bytes as payload length also mentions correctly. But, my doubt is on notification data which is 2D. It is always 2D even if I set notification data on sending node (say 01). This

[strongSwan] incorrect notification data for critical invalid payload type

2012-07-01 Thread gowrishankar
Hi, I am testing IKEv2 implementation for invalid but critical payload type. strongswan seems to be sending notification payload of message type UNSUPPORTED_CRITICAL_PAYLOAD as expected. But, notification data is corrupted where as it should be a one-octet payload type as per Section 2.5 of RFC

Re: [strongSwan] incorrect notification data for critical invalid payload type

2012-07-01 Thread Andreas Steffen
What do you mean by corrupted? To my unexperienced eyes the log shows that indeed a one-octet notification payload is sent containing the received and rejected value 0x2D which is not defined according to IANA. Andreas On 07/01/2012 01:39 PM, gowrishankar wrote: Hi, I am testing IKEv2