Re: [strongSwan] IPv6 tunnel and IPv4 traffic: no routing entries in table 220 ?

2020-01-29 Thread Thomas Rudolph
Hi Tobias, oh wow I really have "Ein Brett vorm Kopf" yes it works now, thank you very much. Regards, Thomas -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Tobias Brunner Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2020 13:54 An: Thomas Rudolph ; users@lists.strongswan.org Betreff: Re: [strongSwan] IPv6

Re: [strongSwan] IPv6 tunnel and IPv4 traffic: no routing entries in table 220 ?

2020-01-29 Thread Tobias Brunner
Hi Thomas, > root@strongswan:/home/rudt/projects/vpn-server# swanctl -i --ike conn1 With this you initiate a childless IKE_SA. Without IPsec/CHILD_SA you obviously won't be able to tunnel any traffic. Try with `--child child1` (or use `start_action=trap` in that child config to trigger the

Re: [strongSwan] IPv6 tunnel and IPv4 traffic: no routing entries in table 220 ?

2020-01-29 Thread Noel Kuntze
Hello Thomas, Routes are added when traffic needs to be sent to another destination than the main routing table or existing routes in table 220 do. It's all in C code. Please provide all information as shown on he HelpRequests page on the wiki if you want any actionable advice. Kind regards