[strongSwan] Performance of libipsec in strongswan ( kernel-vpp plugin )

2021-01-20 Thread Venumadhav Josyula
Hi Tobias, In 'Issue #964', you mentioned it was not intended for high volume traffic. Is this still the case in lastest strongswan too. Meaning we have vpp based stack, where we want to use kernel-vpp plugin for the same. In other words, I want to know if it can be used in security gateways.

Re: [strongSwan] Performance of libipsec in strongswan ( kernel-vpp plugin )

2021-01-20 Thread Venumadhav Josyula
Hi Noel, Thanks for the quick response. Is there something in the roadmap to address this case ? Thanks, Regards, Venu On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 10:37, Noel Kuntze wrote: > Hello Venu, > > That is still the case. > > Kind regards > > Noel > > Am 21.01.21 um 05:52 schrieb Venumadhav Josyula: > >

[strongSwan] strongSwan, FRR, NHRP

2021-01-20 Thread Volodymyr Litovka
Hi colleagues, docs @ http://docs.frrouting.org/en/latest/nhrpd.html describes the way to create DMVPN network using FRR and says the following: "nhrpd needs tight integration with IKE daemon for various reasons. Currently only strongSwan is supported as IKE daemon. ... strongSwan currently