Re: [strongSwan] Problems with rpmbuild and strongswan 4.2.10 and 4.2.11

2009-01-21 Thread Nicole Hähnel
Hi, same problem still with strongswan 4.2.11. Nobody else with this problem on sles10 sp2? Libtool version is 1.5.22-13.12, too many dependencies to update to a newer version. ../../libtool: line 463: CDPATH: command not found ../../libtool: line 1141: func_opt_split: command not found libtool

[strongSwan] ANNOUNCE: strongswan-4.2.11 released

2009-01-21 Thread Andreas Steffen
Hi, The strongSwan 4.2.11 release fixes two minor bugs that were introduced in the latest code refactoring: - Fixed ESP NULL encryption broken by the refactoring of keymat.c. Also introduced proper initialization and disposal of keying material. - Fixed the missing listing of connection defini

[strongSwan] strong swan rpm

2009-01-21 Thread Leonid Sigal
How to build latest release rpm ? ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.strongswan.org https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [strongSwan] dpd + nat keepalive

2009-01-21 Thread Andreas Steffen
In order to activate DPD you must set dpdaction=clear|hold|restart because the default is dpdaction=none. Andreas Peter Müller wrote: > Hello, > > I have set dpddelay=10, but I can only see keep alives are send in the > daemon.log. > I think the keep alives are nat keepalives. > Why is the

[strongSwan] edit dpd + nat keepalive

2009-01-21 Thread Peter Müller
sorry I should tell you, that I use IKEv2 -- NUR NOCH BIS 31.01.! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL für nur 16,37 EURO/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.strongswan.org https://lists.strongswan.org

[strongSwan] dpd + nat keepalive

2009-01-21 Thread Peter Müller
Hello, I have set dpddelay=10, but I can only see keep alives are send in the daemon.log. I think the keep alives are nat keepalives. Why is there no informational send all 10 seconds. I have no other traffic send through the tunnel. Regards Peter -- NUR NOCH BIS 31.01.! GMX FreeDSL - Telefon