Re: [strongSwan] Multiple subnets for the "left|rightsubnet" option

2010-02-02 Thread Martin Willi
Hi, > Can it be said that each strongSwan "conn" definition always results > in at least one kernel SA pair? Yes. > wondering if there is ever a case where strongSwan uses this technique > of mapping multiple kernel policies to the same kernel SA pair when > the kernel polices are the result o

Re: [strongSwan] Unable to locate a send socket for port 0

2010-02-02 Thread dfg dfg
Just to followup. I have now uninstalled the installed version of strongswan that was from apt-get. I have downloaded the latest versio (4.3.5) and compiled that myself. This is now the error I am getting on the mobile node: 05[CFG] received stroke: add connection 'mh'05[CFG] left nor right

[strongSwan] Unable to locate a send socket for port 0

2010-02-02 Thread dfg dfg
Hi everyone, I am currently setting up a mobile ipv6 testbench. I have succesfully demonstated binding updates and acknowledgements without any IPSec. Currently, I am trying to get IPSec to work.I am following the configuration here: http://wiki.strongswan.org/wiki/1/MobileIPv6 and am using s

Re: [strongSwan] Multiple subnets for the "left|rightsubnet" option

2010-02-02 Thread Pisano, Stephen G (Stephen)
Thanks Martin. Can it be said that each strongSwan "conn" definition always results in at least one kernel SA pair? I am wondering if there is ever a case where strongSwan uses this technique of mapping multiple kernel policies to the same kernel SA pair when the kernel polices are the resul

Re: [strongSwan] a negotiation timeout after IKE_SA_INIT may become unrecoverable

2010-02-02 Thread Martin Willi
Hi Christophe, > If an IKEv2 negotiation fails due to a timeout (typically during the > IKE_AUTH exchange) after a successful IKE_SA_INIT exchange [...] > The SA will remain in a zombie state, even a later acquire message will > not enable to leave this lock up situation. I agree, this is a cas

Re: [strongSwan] Getting Strongswan to NOT use port 500 ?

2010-02-02 Thread Martin Willi
Hi Graham, > Is there any way to configure strongSwan to go straight to using port 4500 > (or, try port 500 and then try port 4500) ? No, there is currently no such configure option. > Or is it hack-the-code time ? Probably yes. Changing the IKEV2_UDP_PORT definition in src/charon/daemon.h shou

[strongSwan] Getting Strongswan to NOT use port 500 ?

2010-02-02 Thread Graham Hudspith
Dear All, We're happily using strongSwan 4.3.5+, but we've come up against a situation where the route between us and the Security-Gateway has a firewall which is configured to open port 4500 only and to NOT open port 500. Is there any way to configure strongSwan to go straight to using port 4500

Re: [strongSwan] use config in sqlite

2010-02-02 Thread Andreas Steffen
strongSwan's ipsec script is usually located either in /usr/sbin/ipsec or /usr/local/sbin/ipsec Best regards Andreas Xia Weizhong wrote: > Hi Andreas > > Thanks for all the support so far. > > I am trying to duplicate the uml test in a native environment, then I > tried to manually star

Re: [strongSwan] use config in sqlite

2010-02-02 Thread Xia Weizhong
Hi Andreas Thanks for all the support so far. I am trying to duplicate the uml test in a native environment, then I tried to manually start up ipsec on the road warrior, by /etc/init.d/ipsec start /etc/init.d/ipsec up home then ipsec reports "up" is not supported. Where am I doing wrong? thank