Re: [strongSwan] Question of get_use_time to trigger dpd from libcharon

2019-01-18 Thread Venumadhav Josyula
METHOD(child_sa_t, get_usestats, void, 676 private_child_sa_t *this, bool inbound, 677

[strongSwan] Question on DPD

2019-01-17 Thread Venumadhav Josyula
get_use_time -> get_usebytes, the implementation of it libcharon is as shown below snippet. 1) if bytes, packets are both zero, is the below code correct ? 2) here if they { *bytes, *packets } are '0' for both not calling update_usebytes in code below won't cause dpd to be triggered inspite of

Re: [strongSwan] Question on DPD

2019-01-17 Thread Venumadhav Josyula
But in the background traffic health check messages over ipsec is happening. On Thu, 17 Jan 2019 at 20:11, Venumadhav Josyula wrote: > get_use_time -> get_usebytes, the implementation of it libcharon is as > shown below snippet. > 1) if bytes, packets are both zero, is the below

[strongSwan] Question of get_use_time to trigger dpd from libcharon

2019-01-17 Thread Venumadhav Josyula
get_use_time -> get_usebytes, the implementation of it libcharon is as shown below snippet. 1) if bytes, packets are both zero, is the below code correct ? 2) here if they { *bytes, *packets } are '0' for both not calling update_usebytes in code below won't cause dpd to be triggered inspite of

Re: [strongSwan] DPD question

2020-08-04 Thread Venumadhav Josyula
Hi , Please check strongswan.conf , yes it's possible. Thanks Regards Venu On Tue, 4 Aug, 2020, 9:03 pm Makarand Pradhan, wrote: > Good morning All, > > Is there a way to configure the number of DPD retries before giving up? We > would like to configure 5 R-U-There failures before taking the

[strongSwan] Performance of libipsec in strongswan ( kernel-vpp plugin )

2021-01-20 Thread Venumadhav Josyula
Hi Tobias, In 'Issue #964', you mentioned it was not intended for high volume traffic. Is this still the case in lastest strongswan too. Meaning we have vpp based stack, where we want to use kernel-vpp plugin for the same. In other words, I want to know if it can be used in security gateways.

Re: [strongSwan] Performance of libipsec in strongswan ( kernel-vpp plugin )

2021-01-20 Thread Venumadhav Josyula
Hi Noel, Thanks for the quick response. Is there something in the roadmap to address this case ? Thanks, Regards, Venu On Thu, 21 Jan 2021 at 10:37, Noel Kuntze wrote: > Hello Venu, > > That is still the case. > > Kind regards > > Noel > > Am 21.01.21 um 05:52