Martin,
For what ever reason on my old system, it seems after installing the library,
something bad was happening.
I've tested your GIT branch from my new vmware host. It works properly. I can
see DPD's received on the IOS Cisco device.
It's good to be committed I think.
manowar strongswan
of] interoperability between strongswan
and Cisco IOS
From: mar...@strongswan.org
To: olivier_pele...@hotmail.com
CC: users@lists.strongswan.org
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:01:32 +0200
the /usr/sbin/ipsec file is indeed the new one.
That's just a simple wrapper script to control
...
* ERROR: net-misc/strongswan- failed (configure phase):
* no configure script found
Regards,
Olivier
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] DPD [lack of] interoperability between strongswan
and Cisco IOS
From: mar...@strongswan.org
To: olivier_pele...@hotmail.com
CC: users@lists.strongswan.org
Date
Nevermind... I've found the autogen.sh...
From: olivier_pele...@hotmail.com
To: mar...@strongswan.org
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:05:57 +0200
CC: users@lists.strongswan.org
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] DPD [lack of] interoperability between strongswan and
Cisco IOS
Hello Martin,
In order
Martin,
I've compiled the image and I'm still facing the same issue.
I've picked up the branch
*
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_b7ba363cae580845819ae3501fb157e9.xml
* GIT update --
*repository: git://git.strongswan.org/strongswan.git
*at the commit:
[lack of] interoperability between strongswan
and Cisco IOS
From: mar...@strongswan.org
To: olivier_pele...@hotmail.com
CC: users@lists.strongswan.org
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:48:17 +0200
parsed ID_PROT response 0 [ KE No V V V V NAT-D NAT-D ]
generating ID_PROT request 0 [ ID HASH
Hello Martin,
Yeah that would be awesome. Cisco IOS keep that task alive and from that side,
it can sends DPD. That would be nice if StrongSwan would do the same.
BTW is there any workaround here?
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] DPD [lack of] interoperability between strongswan
and Cisco IOS
Hi Olivier,
Strongswan Sends his Vendor ID in Main Mode 1 - IOS sends his vendor ID
in Main Mode 4 but Strongswan does not seems to recognize it.
Yes, we currently process vendor ID payloads in the first message only.
Seems that this is insufficient for some implementations.
When I find some
2013 21:15:15 +0200
Subject: [strongSwan] DPD [lack of] interoperability between strongswan and
Cisco IOS
Hello guys,
While playing [ikev1] with Strongswan and Cisco IOS, I've seen the following
wierd behavior:
Strongswan Sends his Vendor ID in Main Mode 1 - IOS sends his vendor ID
Hello guys,
While playing [ikev1] with Strongswan and Cisco IOS, I've seen the following
wierd behavior:
Strongswan Sends his Vendor ID in Main Mode 1 - IOS sends his vendor ID in Main
Mode 4 but Strongswan does not seems to recognize it.
I had a look at RFC 3706 / 2407 / 2408 and I dont see
10 matches
Mail list logo
