Re: [strongSwan] Issues with HA configuration

2015-09-28 Thread Whisker, Peter
= xfrm_replay_recheck_esn, .notify = xfrm_replay_notify_esn, .overflow = xfrm_replay_overflow_esn, + .failover = xfrm_replay_failover_esn, }; int xfrm_init_replay(struct xfrm_state *x) -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.strongswan.org [mailto:

Re: [strongSwan] Issues with HA configuration

2015-09-28 Thread Martin Willi
Hi Peter, > If the hash is on SOURCE IP then won’t it potentially hash to a > different segment depending on the direction of the message? Yes. The current code does not enforce a return path over the same segment, so a connection might return over the other node. You'll have to consider that if

Re: [strongSwan] Issues with HA configuration

2015-09-26 Thread Noel Kuntze
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 25.09.2015 um 16:22 schrieb Whisker, Peter: > /usr/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -i ens224 -d 10.0.0.2 -j CLUSTERIP --new > --hashmode sourceip --clustermac 01:00:5e:00:64:20--total-nodes 2 > --local-node 0 You need to use different --local-node

[strongSwan] Issues with HA configuration

2015-09-25 Thread Whisker, Peter
Hi I'm struggling with the HA cluster configuration on Centos 7 (I have what seems to work well running on Debian Jessie). I have now got to a stage where the IPSec side of the HA seems to be working (one node is passive and one is active) but I'm having issues routing to the protected network

[strongSwan] Issues with HA configuration

2015-09-25 Thread Whisker, Peter
Hi I'm struggling with the HA cluster configuration on Centos 7 (I have what seems to work well running on Debian Jessie). I have now got to a stage where the IPSec side of the HA seems to be working (one node is passive and one is active) but I'm having issues routing to the protected network