Re: [strongSwan] Multiple IKEv2 proposals

2019-07-04 Thread Graham Bartlett (grbartle) 
Hi

Just to close the loop Noel replied unicast.

But to answer your Q, I did read the man page (it's clear and explicitly says 
to use a ',' between proposals), but I was fat fingering the proposals and so 
it was failing hence I thought that it wasn't possible.

Thanks for the help.

cheers

On 02/07/2019, 08:31, "Tobias Brunner"  wrote:

Hi Graham,

> Is it possible to send multiple IKEv2 proposals?

Sure, why do you think it's not? 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [strongSwan] Multiple IKEv2 proposals

2019-07-02 Thread Tobias Brunner 
Hi Graham,

> Is it possible to send multiple IKEv2 proposals?

Sure, why do you think it's not?  Refer to the man page or wiki
documentation for the configuration backend you are using.

> The use case being, one with combined mode ciphers and the other without.

The default "proposal" (for IKEv2, not for ESP), in fact, consists of
two proposals for that reason.

Regards,
Tobias

[strongSwan] Multiple IKEv2 proposals

2019-07-01 Thread Graham Bartlett (grbartle) 
Hi

Is it possible to send multiple IKEv2 proposals?

The use case being, one with combined mode ciphers and the other without.

Many thanks 


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature