Re: [strongSwan] Multiple tunnels between two endpoints

2013-01-08 Thread Ali Masoudi
Thank you so much Dirk Maybe it is related to timing, I am going to check that. In that case, if I bring up tunnels one by one with a slight delay, the problem must be solved I think. Best wishes On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Dirk Hartmann wrote: > > > --On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 11:30:00

Re: [strongSwan] Multiple tunnels between two endpoints

2013-01-08 Thread Dirk Hartmann
--On Tuesday, January 08, 2013 11:30:00 AM +0330 Ali Masoudi wrote: > Thank you Dirk for your answer, > > But what about ikev1 connections? I think using multiple subnets in > one connection is acceptable in ikev2. If I'm wrong, correct me > please. no that is correct. "IKEv2 supports multipl

Re: [strongSwan] Multiple tunnels between two endpoints

2013-01-08 Thread Ali Masoudi
Thank you Dirk for your answer, But what about ikev1 connections? I think using multiple subnets in one connection is acceptable in ikev2. If I'm wrong, correct me please. I use "reuse_ikesa = no" for a while and I have no problem, but in the last week, I started to work with hearbeat service fro

Re: [strongSwan] Multiple tunnels between two endpoints

2013-01-07 Thread Dirk Hartmann
Hi Ali, --On Monday, January 07, 2013 02:39:55 PM +0330 Ali Masoudi wrote: > I have a simple question, and I would be grateful if anyone could > answer it. > > If we want to establish multiple tunnels between two endpoints, is it > recommended to use "reuse_ikesa = no" option in strongswan.conf

[strongSwan] Multiple tunnels between two endpoints

2013-01-07 Thread Ali Masoudi
Hi all I have a simple question, and I would be grateful if anyone could answer it. If we want to establish multiple tunnels between two endpoints, is it recommended to use "reuse_ikesa = no" option in strongswan.conf. I figured it in my tests that it is better to use the default config. Am I ri